date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Julio
(new)
Feb 18, 2014 07:00AM
outstanding. my thoughts exactly.
reply
|
flag
Can we also please admit that there is stuff out there that just couldn't be saved by any editor, ever?
Books have become like TV series, they are sold by the hype created not by their worth. And I have to admit that unfortunately not all readers are descerning. Personally I have no time to waste on badly written books, I'd like to consider my time as precious and love it when others consider it so as well.
D.C. wrote: "Can we also please admit that there is stuff out there that just couldn't be saved by any editor, ever?"AMEN
I think the danger is generalisation. There are some books published by leading mainstream publishers that have proofreading errors - it's naive to assume that all traditional publishers have meticulous editing standards. Most of us probably decide within the first sentence or two if a book or story is for us - if we are honest. And often it is individual preference? Personally I like the safety net of an editor I trust reading my work but equally I hate the notion that everything I read has to go through a gatekeeper who decides if I'd like to read it or not. I love having that freedom to choose my fiction and discoveries are always fun.
I like being able to choose my fiction also and I'm all for self publishing but I REALLY wish that more authors would have the self respect to get their stuff edited. How ridiculous is it when you're reading something and wondering what the hell is going on or laughing and rolling your eyes at the typos? Sometimes I think these authors didn't even bother to use spell/grammar check on their Word program, and that's just not even cute. I do a lot of blogging and I spend an inordinate amount of time rereading my stuff for typos and grammatical errors and correct punctuation and I am EMBARRASSED AS FUCK to put something out into the world with even 1 mistake, much less a slew of them. If only these authors felt the same way.
I have yet to meet an indie author "shaming the reader", but I don't doubt they exist. Any time I speak to an indie author (those new to the industry), I always make sure to stress that producing the highest quality product is not just tantamount to individual success, but success for the whole.Personally, I know my limits. I am no editor. That is a very special skill that most writers don't have in their tool kit. That is why I hire editors to pour over my words. Every indie author should have at least one editor they have on "pay roll".
"If you want me to consider self-publishing seriously, take your profession seriously."I think this line should be in all caps, underlined, and highlighted...
D.C. wrote: "Can we also please admit that there is stuff out there that just couldn't be saved by any editor, ever?"This
Thank you for reporting this here, Edward. :)
Jack wrote: "I have yet to meet an indie author "shaming the reader", but I don't doubt they exist. Any time I speak to an indie author (those new to the industry), I always make sure to stress that producing t..."I've seen authors claim that readers are not reading their work "correctly". There is no correct way to read. Reader's perceptions are their own. It's particularly irritating when a whole series of readers are not reading something "the right way" and it becomes blindingly obvious to me that whatever the author thinks is on the page, isn't.
I do not use an editor for my self-pubs, mostly because I'm poor. Most, although not all, readers cannot tell that they haven't been edited by someone else. I do have a few tricks. I usually use betas, I encourage them to be HIGHLY CRITICAL, and then I listen to them. I am acquainted with a style manual, although it is the one I had in college, and I know some of my grammatical practices are old-fashioned. I also read passages I'm not sure of out loud, and I will bounce stuff off family members with editing experience. Except for that last part, anyone can do this. A real editor is better, but there's no excuse for raw copy.



