Open Letter to Self-Published Authors, by All Hail Grimlock

(E. here. The following is a post from a Booklikes member that goes by the handle All Hail Grimlock. I keep hearing about how the “Sea of Crap” isn’t affecting indie authors and their sales. Some even say their sales are getting better. The fact of the matter is, I’ve been watching the tides change, mainly because I’m an active member of book sites like Goodreads and Booklikes. For fuck’s sake, who’re you going to listen to? Other authors? Or the people who actually buy your books? It might not be bad now, but it’s coming. Get a clue.)


The following post can be read HERE or below.


 

I’ve been reading about Chuck Wendig and how he’s a gatekeeper on the kboards, or how he’s chastising and saying awful things, and why should you care if anyone else produces dreck?


So I’ll say what I’ve said from the start, which is if you don’t care, neither do I. I see many authors, self-published authors, who will not care about editing and say they can’t afford editing, and also complain that people – people like me – don’t give self-publishing authors much of a chance, if they give them a chance at all.


I hear, ‘just read the samples’, ‘what do you expect for ninety-nine cents or even three dollars’, or some form of argument that amounts to me going through a slushpile that wouldn’t make it past editors at publishing companies. I’m not interested; I have better ways to spend my time, in fact, than reading hundreds of samples to find a well-edited, professional book when I can find that elsewhere.


Or in other words, you can’t have it both ways. If you want me to consider self-publishing seriously, take your profession seriously. The fact that so many authors are cheerleading mediocre, half-assed efforts only encourages me not to turn to self-published books for my reading needs.


I’ve found some self-publishers who are amazing. Talented, edited, professional, and even courteous. But the majority do not fall into that category, and I am unwilling to put up with sifting through unedited manuscripts. If you, as you claim, want more people to read self-edited books, then stop putting the onus on the readers. Stop telling us it’s our responsibility to make our way through the labyrinths of poorly edited, and unedited books, to find those. Stop trying to shame us because we have books we know we like, published by a company that has minimum standards; you try to shame us by pointing at us and telling us we’re not putting in the effort. And therein lies your problem: for some of us, it’s just so much of an effort to find anything that does meet those minimum standards in the self-publishing community. Stop telling us that only the good books will survive, as clearly that is not the case because unedited manuscripts that read like the author knows english as a second or third language – to be generous – wrote it become bestsellers.


If other people want to read that, want to waste their time searching for the diamonds in the rough, so be it. I do not. And I refuse to do it. Not only that, horror of horrors, I refuse to be shamed for using my time wisely and sticking to what I like – from brilliant traditionally published books, to self-published books my friends with great taste recommend, to horrible monster-porn that makes me laugh it’s so bad.


I’m certainly not going to see the light of sampling all day long just because one more author who doesn’t care about their product, and doesn’t want to spend time or money editing their books, tells me that the samples exist. I know. I’m still not even sampling your books for a reason.


(E. again. For those of you saying to yourself that this is just one person’s thoughts, you’re mistaken. It’s already much harder to get reviews for self-published books and it will continue to get more difficult. The simple truth is that most readers aren’t as vocal as this, but they feel the same way. What you will see is a gradual decrease in sales for indies, or no sales whatsoever. Of course authors like Konrath and Howey and Wendig are projecting a massive increase in sales, they’ve already grown and cultivated a fan base. If you’re not worried about this recent shift in reviewers’ attitude, you’re a damn fool.)


14 likes ·   •  11 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 17, 2014 10:37
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Julio (new)

Julio Genao outstanding. my thoughts exactly.


message 2: by D.C. (new)

D.C. Can we also please admit that there is stuff out there that just couldn't be saved by any editor, ever?


message 3: by Sofia (new)

Sofia Books have become like TV series, they are sold by the hype created not by their worth. And I have to admit that unfortunately not all readers are descerning. Personally I have no time to waste on badly written books, I'd like to consider my time as precious and love it when others consider it so as well.


message 4: by H (new)

H Beeyit *stands up, applauding wildly*


message 5: by Julio (new)

Julio Genao D.C. wrote: "Can we also please admit that there is stuff out there that just couldn't be saved by any editor, ever?"

AMEN


message 6: by Tris (new)

Tris Merlin I think the danger is generalisation. There are some books published by leading mainstream publishers that have proofreading errors - it's naive to assume that all traditional publishers have meticulous editing standards. Most of us probably decide within the first sentence or two if a book or story is for us - if we are honest. And often it is individual preference? Personally I like the safety net of an editor I trust reading my work but equally I hate the notion that everything I read has to go through a gatekeeper who decides if I'd like to read it or not. I love having that freedom to choose my fiction and discoveries are always fun.


message 7: by E (new)

E I like being able to choose my fiction also and I'm all for self publishing but I REALLY wish that more authors would have the self respect to get their stuff edited. How ridiculous is it when you're reading something and wondering what the hell is going on or laughing and rolling your eyes at the typos? Sometimes I think these authors didn't even bother to use spell/grammar check on their Word program, and that's just not even cute.

I do a lot of blogging and I spend an inordinate amount of time rereading my stuff for typos and grammatical errors and correct punctuation and I am EMBARRASSED AS FUCK to put something out into the world with even 1 mistake, much less a slew of them. If only these authors felt the same way.


message 8: by Jack (new)

Jack Wallen I have yet to meet an indie author "shaming the reader", but I don't doubt they exist. Any time I speak to an indie author (those new to the industry), I always make sure to stress that producing the highest quality product is not just tantamount to individual success, but success for the whole.

Personally, I know my limits. I am no editor. That is a very special skill that most writers don't have in their tool kit. That is why I hire editors to pour over my words. Every indie author should have at least one editor they have on "pay roll".


message 9: by In2books (new)

In2books "If you want me to consider self-publishing seriously, take your profession seriously."

I think this line should be in all caps, underlined, and highlighted...


TinaNicole ☠ Le Book Nikita ☠ D.C. wrote: "Can we also please admit that there is stuff out there that just couldn't be saved by any editor, ever?"

This

Thank you for reporting this here, Edward. :)


message 11: by D.C. (new)

D.C. Jack wrote: "I have yet to meet an indie author "shaming the reader", but I don't doubt they exist. Any time I speak to an indie author (those new to the industry), I always make sure to stress that producing t..."

I've seen authors claim that readers are not reading their work "correctly". There is no correct way to read. Reader's perceptions are their own. It's particularly irritating when a whole series of readers are not reading something "the right way" and it becomes blindingly obvious to me that whatever the author thinks is on the page, isn't.

I do not use an editor for my self-pubs, mostly because I'm poor. Most, although not all, readers cannot tell that they haven't been edited by someone else. I do have a few tricks. I usually use betas, I encourage them to be HIGHLY CRITICAL, and then I listen to them. I am acquainted with a style manual, although it is the one I had in college, and I know some of my grammatical practices are old-fashioned. I also read passages I'm not sure of out loud, and I will bounce stuff off family members with editing experience. Except for that last part, anyone can do this. A real editor is better, but there's no excuse for raw copy.


back to top

Edward Lorn's Blog

Edward Lorn
Edward Lorn isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Edward Lorn's blog with rss.