date
newest »



Back when I was doing my first novel, I deliberately limited it to two viewpoint characters and about a week of time to keep things simple. Of course, I did that one on a manual typewriter, when "cut and paste" meant cutting, and pasting.


Using a villain's p.o.v. now and then is useful to give the readers stuff the protagonists' don't know, too.






No, really. Even got the hot native princess and went up the tropical river to rescue the lost explorers.
(*) gay black subdivision, but hey.

I offered to change her into a gay Indian guy from Montana and Swindapa into a blond male, but that wouldn't do and I think he sort of resented the suggestion.
He said, I quote, that he couldn't make the readers eat ***t.
So I yanked it, paid back the advance and walked. I knew it was the best thing I'd done, tho' I was how-am-I-going-to-meet-the-rent broke at the time.
I got an agent, and -he- liked it. As he said to me, there were only two ways to make him read a thousand-page manuscript over a weekend, and I hadn't been there in New York sticking a frakking gun to his head.
He sold it (two competing offers and a third nibble) within two weeks, saving me from eviction, and it's now in its 26th printing, averaging more than two a year since. My editor says they don't even -discuss- whether to reprint at meetings any more.
"I was right
And he was wrong
So I get to sing
The "I was right" song."
I usually don't mind editors making suggestions, but sometimes you've got to go with your gut.

No, really. Even got the hot native princess and went up the tropical river to rescue the..."
Yeah, I loved the scene where Marion is off in the jungle with her lily-white proto-Celtic askaris :)

In my (admittedly very limited) experience, a character can make or break a story. Armageddon Girl (originally titled The Armageddon Agenda) didn't really take off for me until I started working on Christine Dark's character, who went from a standard-issue damsel in distress to the main character of the story (inspired by an overdose of Felicia Day movie/tv/web characters). Without that character, I don't think the novel would have seen the light of day.

One of my pet peeves is characters in a SFnal situation who -don't know pop culture-.
You know, "whatever could those two small marks on the throat be?"
Christine certainly didn't have -that- problem. She's an accurate reflection of the fact that fantasy/SF tropes saturate modern popular culture.
At the same time, she's continually running up against the contrast of -playing- adventure and actually undergoing adventure -- defined as someone else in deep doodoo far away.
Really nicely handled.


Faceoff has a hard-boiled detective "feel" that I like quite a lot.
In any case, I have no complaints on the multiple POVs score. I AM sorry we won't be seeing any more of the Red Baron:-P.