date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Experiment BL626
(new)
Jan 30, 2014 09:46PM
Not every book has to have a point and be meaningful and shit. What do you think literary fiction is for? :p
reply
|
flag
Experiment BL626 (Against GR Censorship) wrote: "Not every book has to have a point and be meaningful and shit. What do you think literary fiction is for? :p"Hahaha. Well what I meant is that it's easier to stick your guns when you made those creative decisions for a reason.
If it helps, you can always put in an author's note to reader at the end of the book and explain your thought process. Could be a line of "I wrote this for shit and giggles." Not that it would deflect criticisms, it's not supposed to, but at least readers would know where you and your book stand.
God, I don't think it matters. Some of the reviews for the m/m group freebie event each year, which are written for fun, are utterly unforgiving
Emma Sea wrote: "God, I don't think it matters. Some of the reviews for the m/m group freebie event each year, which are written for fun, are utterly unforgiving"Insecurity leads people to take things too seriously. Sometimes bad is really, really fun. Campy, ridiculous, OTT oodles of WTF! Awesomeness.
I think Experiment has it with the author's note. That won't keep any kind of publication--whether a book, a blog post or whatever else you put online--from being criticised if it's in some way worthy or needy of criticism. But a straight up author's note stating "hey, I *know* this is sexist (badly written, yucky,... whatever), but I still wanted it out there" would go a long way towards leniency.Emma, the m/m freebies are different. I think a lot of people view them either similar to prompt-fests within fandom (have a peek at fandom-related anon-memes for vicious criticising of free stories!), and if not that, then at least as a commercial effort from the known or soon-to-be-known professional authors.
All that's the nature of the beast I'd say. I remember the very first tentative websites and publications of stories or content in the mid-1990s. They also already were criticised, and not mildly so either. Just look at the word stem of "publisher" and "publish", no one says money has to be involved. All it has to be is public. ;)
Emma Sea wrote: "God, I don't think it matters. Some of the reviews for the m/m group freebie event each year, which are written for fun, are utterly unforgiving"Main reason why I don't participate in that anymore. I'm all for honest reviews, but "write me a full story for free to my exact specifications under a time limit and oh btw make sure it's your best work" is a bit much. Of course most everyone uses it as a vehicle to promote themselves so I guess it's true what they say about water finding its own level ^_^;;;;
(plus I asked them not to include my story in the official anthology that one year I tried it ... and they did anyway >.> *sigh*)
julio wrote: "isa: no seeders. i haz sad.
expy: *snort*"
Oh yeah, sorry I forgot to turn off the "stop seeding when there are no peers" option *lol*
Isa wrote: "(plus I asked them not to include my story in the official anthology that one year I tried it ... and they did anyway >.> *sigh*)..."The failure to refrain from publishing the stories on GR due the new ownership and shady TOS was what made me retract last year. The suggested alternatives would have worked just fine.
Isa wrote: "Main reason why I don't participate in that anymore. I'm all for honest reviews, but "write me a full story for free to my exact specifications under a time limit and oh btw make sure it's your best work" is a bit much."Don't blame the readers. Blame the writers who release quality reads for free. It's all their fault. Once a person have tasted food from the fairies... @_@
Hmm but let's imagine I read a book and absolutely love it and then I find out that author thinks that the book is awful. Awkward.
The opposite case is the one that usually happens. Author writing an awful book, thinking it's actually good. Awkward beats arrogant every time imo.
Weasel wrote: "Reading your post I feel like you are bowing to easily to other peoples' definition of "good"."The reality is books are not judged in isolation. If a reader loves one book, they will assume they'll love all the others. If a publisher does well with one book, they'll give you more creative freedom with future releases.
So if you release something not up-to-par, even if it's "just for fun", it inevitably effects everything else. It's not just a question of do I feel satisfied with this book? It's a question of do I feel satisfied with this book enough to have everything else I ever write judged by it.
Sometimes the answer is no. Then what? You have a book with some value, a book that a few people might actually enjoy, that you don't feel comfortable releasing...
Isa wrote: "Sometimes the answer is no. Then what? You have a book with some value, a book that a few people might actually enjoy, that you don't feel comfortable releasing...."Publish it under a pseud.
Experiment BL626 (Against GR Censorship) wrote: "The opposite case is the one that usually happens. Author writing an awful book, thinking it's actually good. Awkward beats arrogant every time imo."So true.
every thing you write and release is going to be someone's first exposure to you and your writing. isa's right to think about it.pseudonym all the way.
Isa - thanks for the link! :)But don't do torrents often, so I have no idea why I am stuck on downloading 0% for the past 3-4 minutes. I'll wait some more, I am persistent :D
Mammarella wrote: "Isa - thanks for the link! :)But don't do torrents often, so I have no idea why I am stuck on downloading 0% for the past 3-4 minutes. I'll wait some more, I am persistent :D"
LOL I know. I'm a techie so I will always complicate matters unnecessarily by using TEH TECHN0L0GY THAT MAKES EVERYTHING EASIER
Alternatively:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/86s0xk1fnc...
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/r7e9o3ninr...
Thanks again! TECHN0L0GY THAT MAKES EVERYTHING EASIER - ha-ha, funny! :D
Got the e-pubs :) Will read as soon as I am done with my challenges for this month.
I am still upset with my torch. Will probably spend next few hours trying to figure out what is going on.
Vivian wrote: "I swear I will in a different universe; I don't even know what a torrent is."Torrent is file sharing. Google it, there are sites that explain it pretty well.
Here, I stole this bit from Wikipedia:
"Rather than downloading a file from a single source server, the BitTorrent protocol allows users to join a "swarm" of hosts to download and upload from each other simultaneously"


