Ode to Truly Awful Books

A book is a lot of different things. On the basic level it's a form of communication ... but communication of what? To whom?

One of the ways the internet has changed the landscape for authors is by bringing all kinds of different audiences together in the same space. Great for the readers, who get to compare the recommendations of a variety of different groups before making a purchase, but seriously stressful for the writers. You have to be one royal pain in the ass not to feel pressure to make everyone happy.

The Freelancers is one of those books that I find difficult to defend. It's a bit campy, a bit unrealistic, a bit melodramatic, a bit ridiculous, a bit offensive-- a bit of everything it was intended to be, but I just can't find the energy to mount any "yes, but..." responses to the inevitable criticism. I can't think of a single good reason WHY these books are the way they are ... just that it amused me to write them that way.

With most of my books I've been able to face the threat of different audiences interpreting the same details different ways (and criticizing me for it) by focusing on some overarching message I really wanted to communicate. By keeping that in mind I was able to survive the editing process, the push back from my publishers to make the book more marketable or traditional. I knew what I wanted to say, so I knew what compromises would destroy that message and what ones wouldn't.

But not with The Freelancers.

There's really no point to these books, no theme, no philosophical undertone. I write them for fun, playing around with the campy, sexist, ridiculous stylistic elements of old-school spy movies. The Freelancers to me are like B-movie books. All your criticisms of them are valid.

And yet...

Shortly after I finished the first volume (The Freelancers: The Translator) I realized I just couldn't publish it. I couldn't go through that whole process because I didn't know how to defend it. The book was terrible ... but I still kind of loved it. And yet I couldn't really put my finger on WHAT exactly I liked about it, so how could I help improve it?

Publishing it would be a shit show, trying to turn a book that was never intended to be good into something good. I wasn't willing to go through that process. It seemed too disheartening and stressful.

But still ... I had written it. I wanted to put it in the hands of people who would enjoy it.

There used to be a clear line between published and unpublished. It used to be you could throw something up on the internet for free and people would cut you some slack on it. Free stuff on the internet wasn't published. There was no expectation that your work should represent you because there was no conceivable benefit to you when you gave it away for free.

That isn't the case anymore. So I had a bit of a dilemma. How do you distribute a book ... without publishing it?

Pirate Bay of course :)

Yes, that's right. As of today I am bootlegging my own books!

You can download the torrent for The Freelancers: The Translator HERE

And the torrent for The Freelancers: The Mercenary HERE

Each torrent contains versions of the book in doc, pdf, epub and mobi.

Read at your own risk ... but trust me when I say they are awful :D :D :D Delightfully so!
9 likes ·   •  26 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 30, 2014 20:41
Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Experiment BL626 Not every book has to have a point and be meaningful and shit. What do you think literary fiction is for? :p


message 2: by Isa (new)

Isa K. Experiment BL626 (Against GR Censorship) wrote: "Not every book has to have a point and be meaningful and shit. What do you think literary fiction is for? :p"

Hahaha. Well what I meant is that it's easier to stick your guns when you made those creative decisions for a reason.


message 3: by Emma Sea (new)

Emma Sea Bootlegging your own books: brilliant.


message 4: by Julio (new)

Julio Genao isa: no seeders. i haz sad.

expy: *snort*


Experiment BL626 If it helps, you can always put in an author's note to reader at the end of the book and explain your thought process. Could be a line of "I wrote this for shit and giggles." Not that it would deflect criticisms, it's not supposed to, but at least readers would know where you and your book stand.


message 6: by Emma Sea (new)

Emma Sea God, I don't think it matters. Some of the reviews for the m/m group freebie event each year, which are written for fun, are utterly unforgiving


Experiment BL626 There is fun in eviscerating bad books. It's akin to watching bad movies, I would think.


message 8: by Vivian (last edited Jan 30, 2014 10:35PM) (new)

Vivian Emma Sea wrote: "God, I don't think it matters. Some of the reviews for the m/m group freebie event each year, which are written for fun, are utterly unforgiving"

Insecurity leads people to take things too seriously. Sometimes bad is really, really fun. Campy, ridiculous, OTT oodles of WTF! Awesomeness.


message 9: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper I think Experiment has it with the author's note. That won't keep any kind of publication--whether a book, a blog post or whatever else you put online--from being criticised if it's in some way worthy or needy of criticism. But a straight up author's note stating "hey, I *know* this is sexist (badly written, yucky,... whatever), but I still wanted it out there" would go a long way towards leniency.

Emma, the m/m freebies are different. I think a lot of people view them either similar to prompt-fests within fandom (have a peek at fandom-related anon-memes for vicious criticising of free stories!), and if not that, then at least as a commercial effort from the known or soon-to-be-known professional authors.

All that's the nature of the beast I'd say. I remember the very first tentative websites and publications of stories or content in the mid-1990s. They also already were criticised, and not mildly so either. Just look at the word stem of "publisher" and "publish", no one says money has to be involved. All it has to be is public. ;)


message 10: by Isa (new)

Isa K. Emma Sea wrote: "God, I don't think it matters. Some of the reviews for the m/m group freebie event each year, which are written for fun, are utterly unforgiving"

Main reason why I don't participate in that anymore. I'm all for honest reviews, but "write me a full story for free to my exact specifications under a time limit and oh btw make sure it's your best work" is a bit much. Of course most everyone uses it as a vehicle to promote themselves so I guess it's true what they say about water finding its own level ^_^;;;;

(plus I asked them not to include my story in the official anthology that one year I tried it ... and they did anyway >.> *sigh*)

julio wrote: "isa: no seeders. i haz sad.

expy: *snort*"


Oh yeah, sorry I forgot to turn off the "stop seeding when there are no peers" option *lol*


message 11: by Julio (new)

Julio Genao [-__-]

impatient android is impatient


message 12: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper Isa wrote: "(plus I asked them not to include my story in the official anthology that one year I tried it ... and they did anyway >.> *sigh*)..."

The failure to refrain from publishing the stories on GR due the new ownership and shady TOS was what made me retract last year. The suggested alternatives would have worked just fine.


message 13: by Experiment BL626 (last edited Jan 30, 2014 10:52PM) (new)

Experiment BL626 Isa wrote: "Main reason why I don't participate in that anymore. I'm all for honest reviews, but "write me a full story for free to my exact specifications under a time limit and oh btw make sure it's your best work" is a bit much."

Don't blame the readers. Blame the writers who release quality reads for free. It's all their fault. Once a person have tasted food from the fairies... @_@


message 14: by Anna (new)

Anna Kļaviņa Hmm but let's imagine I read a book and absolutely love it and then I find out that author thinks that the book is awful. Awkward.


message 15: by Experiment BL626 (new)

Experiment BL626 The opposite case is the one that usually happens. Author writing an awful book, thinking it's actually good. Awkward beats arrogant every time imo.


message 16: by Isa (new)

Isa K. Weasel wrote: "Reading your post I feel like you are bowing to easily to other peoples' definition of "good"."

The reality is books are not judged in isolation. If a reader loves one book, they will assume they'll love all the others. If a publisher does well with one book, they'll give you more creative freedom with future releases.

So if you release something not up-to-par, even if it's "just for fun", it inevitably effects everything else. It's not just a question of do I feel satisfied with this book? It's a question of do I feel satisfied with this book enough to have everything else I ever write judged by it.

Sometimes the answer is no. Then what? You have a book with some value, a book that a few people might actually enjoy, that you don't feel comfortable releasing...


message 17: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper Isa wrote: "Sometimes the answer is no. Then what? You have a book with some value, a book that a few people might actually enjoy, that you don't feel comfortable releasing...."

Publish it under a pseud.


message 18: by Isa (new)

Isa K. heh weirdly... I never considered that ^_^;;;;


message 19: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper ;)


message 20: by Anna (new)

Anna Kļaviņa Experiment BL626 (Against GR Censorship) wrote: "The opposite case is the one that usually happens. Author writing an awful book, thinking it's actually good. Awkward beats arrogant every time imo."

So true.


message 21: by Julio (new)

Julio Genao every thing you write and release is going to be someone's first exposure to you and your writing. isa's right to think about it.

pseudonym all the way.


message 22: by M'rella (last edited Feb 03, 2014 12:43PM) (new)

M'rella Isa - thanks for the link! :)

But don't do torrents often, so I have no idea why I am stuck on downloading 0% for the past 3-4 minutes. I'll wait some more, I am persistent :D


message 23: by Vivian (new)

Vivian I swear I will in a different universe; I don't even know what a torrent is.


message 24: by Isa (new)

Isa K. Mammarella wrote: "Isa - thanks for the link! :)

But don't do torrents often, so I have no idea why I am stuck on downloading 0% for the past 3-4 minutes. I'll wait some more, I am persistent :D"


LOL I know. I'm a techie so I will always complicate matters unnecessarily by using TEH TECHN0L0GY THAT MAKES EVERYTHING EASIER

Alternatively:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/86s0xk1fnc...
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/r7e9o3ninr...


message 25: by M'rella (last edited Feb 03, 2014 01:10PM) (new)

M'rella Thanks again!

TECHN0L0GY THAT MAKES EVERYTHING EASIER - ha-ha, funny! :D

Got the e-pubs :) Will read as soon as I am done with my challenges for this month.
I am still upset with my torch. Will probably spend next few hours trying to figure out what is going on.


message 26: by M'rella (last edited Feb 03, 2014 01:15PM) (new)

M'rella Vivian wrote: "I swear I will in a different universe; I don't even know what a torrent is."

Torrent is file sharing. Google it, there are sites that explain it pretty well.

Here, I stole this bit from Wikipedia:
"Rather than downloading a file from a single source server, the BitTorrent protocol allows users to join a "swarm" of hosts to download and upload from each other simultaneously"


back to top