The Henry II defense

Many of you may have heard of the current woes of New Jersey’s governor. He is mired in a political scandal that has been called---naturally—Bridgegate. His deputy chief of staff arranged for the closure of all but one lane of the George Washington Bridge into Manhattan, thus creating horrific traffic chaos, greatly inconveniencing thousands, damaging local businesses, and even endangering the public by slowing down first responders; one woman died waiting for an ambulance, although it has not been established that the delay was the direct cause of her death. The apparent motivation for this sabotage was political payback—to punish the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee, supposedly because he’d not endorsed Christie for re-election. Christie fired the aide and swears he had no knowledge of any of this. Barring the discovery of a smoking gun, I’m inclined to accept his denial. Whatever his other failings, no one has ever called him stupid and this was an incredibly stupid thing to do. But there is no doubt that Christie’s presidential hopes have been damaged by this, with his rivals—both Republican and Democrat—gleefully anticipating political commercials about Bridgegate. Comedians are having a field day, too. All of this exposition is to explain the following joke, sent to me by a friend, which I absolutely had to share. As soon as you read it, you’ll understand why:

Is there such a thing as a Henry II defense? “I didn’t mean they should actually rid me of this meddlesome mayor!”
10 likes ·   •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 12, 2014 09:53
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lauri (new)

Lauri I was watching famed attorney Alan Dershowitz in an interview the other day, where he also mentioned Henry II. Dershowitz stated that Christie may have created an "atmosphere" that led his staff to believe he would support their actions.


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon It is hard not to draw that conclusion, Laurie. I hope Christie has learned his lesson. Sadly, Henry didn't. Furious with Richard for not agreeing to turn Aquitaine over to John, he actually told John that it was his if he could take it. Then when John and Geoffrey led an army into Aquitaine, he hastily called them back to England to say he had not been serious! That was a fun scene to write.


message 3: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca Hill I think with Henry II, he was guilty of saying things that he didn't really mean. He was famous for wanting to be the most popular, and I am sure was jealous of the attention that his wife was giving to their children. He should have been thankful for her, as she was the main reason he was able to claim the crown of England. But with fathers and sons, sometimes they push to a point then realize they have pushed to far, and then they have to figure out out a way to reel them back in :)


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.