date
newest »

message 1:
by
RJay
(new)
Dec 26, 2013 01:18PM

reply
|
flag


Yes I agree that Hal probably wouldn't have made a good king - my IF ONLY had more to do with IF ONLY his parents had raised their children to be good rulers. But instead of Hal, England got Richard (with taxes to fight the crusades and a ransom that practically bankrupted the country) followed by John - do you think Hal would have done worse than John? Wouldn't that be a great debate?
