date
newest »

message 1:
by
J.
(new)
Dec 23, 2013 07:21AM

reply
|
flag

J.,
Thank you for taking the time to check out my blog posting.
Jim

First person is better when one character's internal thoughts and feelings are more important. It is up to the author to judge when this is more appropriate. I haven't read 'Levels', but I understand your explanation and it sounds as if you got it right.
One awkward idea to throw in . . . I have only twice seen attempts to write in second person. One was selected episodes in an Ian Banks book (Crow Road, I think, but I don't have a copy handy to make sure) and the other is Charles Stross, in Rule 34. Both attempts surprisingly successful, but I can't help thinking that this is a very difficult trick to attempt!

Alan,
Thank you for taking the time to share your ideas and insight.
I don't believe that I have ever read a novel narrated in the second-person. Come to think of it; I don't believe I have even considered it as an option until reading your comment. Definitely, a novel idea (pun intended).
Jim

For each, it takes me a while to change into that persona and that point of view. To write Andrew, I have to become Andrew. I liken it to getting inside his skull and sitting right behind his eyeballs looking out. Everything is then described as he would.
I've seen good writers do that with rotating first-person pov, and didn't like the effect.
The basic decision is: how many pov characters does a story need, and how are you going to give them all space if there is more than one.
If you ever start up writing again, consider the possibility.

For each, it takes me a while to change into that persona and that point of view. To wr..."
Alicia,
Thank you for viewing the blog post and sharing your personal viewpoint and advice. I readily admit that some of my best ideas have come from others.
Jim Vuksic