Army boots Camp Zama commander

He
was bounced on the usual charge of
"lack of confidence." Army declines further comment, citing privacy concerns. I
wonder whether such concerns are legitimate. After all, these are public
positions, funded by the taxpayer. If a senior government official is removed,
isn't the public entitled to know the reason why?

Also,
I wish that Army public affairs officers would stop
thinking it is cute to release bad news late on Fridays. It is not.