Does an agenda-driven, scientifically-rebuked movement that created its own in-flux status need civil rights?

Claiming that the rebuking of their scientifically-repudiated clams constitutes some sort of civil rights violation, the "ex-gay" advocacy organization PFOX is posing this question to its readers:

[READ: PFOX]

Click through to the link if we want to see their supporting evidence. It's exactly what you would think (e.g. noting the truths about the "ex-gay" movement is discrimination).

The truth, of course, is that "ex-gay"-identified people absolutely, 100%, in every way needs civil rights. And t...