date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Daryn
(new)
Sep 08, 2013 02:33PM
It's good, but (in my opinion) the "gone for good" line is a bit harsh for a light children's tale. Ending it right after "in time" would still work and be less ominous.
reply
|
flag
Thanks, Daryn. I'll consider that. It is a considerably 'squishier' story than my usual fare, and I'm not really in the swing of writing whimsy. Cutting back on the harshness would be good.
I would second Daryn's comment, but I guess the first question is what age group are you targeting? My "four-and-a-half" year-old son is still afraid of "Diesel 10" in the Thomas series, to the point that he segregates the toy when he plays with the trains (he recieved the toy before seeing the movie). If you are targeting the 10-13 age group, then I don't think it would be as much of an issue. I've recently purchased a few of the Gertrude Chandler Warner children's mysteries. I'm not sure if they're still "in" with the current 5-10 year-old set today, but they are well written and I haven't found anything in them objectionable. While my son is still too young for them, my sister's seven year-old enjoys them.
It's a 6 on Flesch-Kincaid, so I wouldn't recommend it for a reader younger than perhaps a precocious seven-year-old (though it would probably be appropriate for supported reading with a child as young as five, if there was a lot of discussion going on), and the story is a bit on the silly side to interest anyone older than ten or eleven. I was a huge Boxcar Children fanatic when I was younger. I had loads of the books, and I'm sad to realize that I'm not sure where they went!


