U.S. Intervention in Syria: Obama’s Incoherent Strategy

U.N. chemical weapons investigation team head arrives at a military hospital in Damascus, Syria

Editor's note: Kenneth Pollack critiques what he sees as an incoherent strategy from the Obama administration on Syria. Outlining the arguments in favor of and against U.S. intervention in Syria, Pollack writes that the White House’s policy has been indecisive due to a desire to avoid committing the United States to a serious military intervention while still enforcing red lines.


The complexities of the Syria conflict touch on American interests in myriad ways—ways that don’t necessarily line up neatly with one course of action or another. There are multiple goals, and multiple strategies that could be employed to achieve those goals, and as a result, there are good arguments to be made both for intervention and against. The only thing that makes no sense, unfortunately, is the path that President Obama appears determined to pursue.


Read the full article at Newsweek »



Authors

Kenneth M. Pollack


Publication: Newsweek

Image Source: © Khaled Al Hariri / Reuters

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 30, 2013 09:07
No comments have been added yet.


Kenneth M. Pollack's Blog

Kenneth M. Pollack
Kenneth M. Pollack isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Kenneth M. Pollack's blog with rss.