The saint and the count, plus two of history's most famous lovers

August 20, 1153 was the death date of Bernard of Clairvaux, the nemesis of the Angevins. It was Bernard who is said to have insisted that from the Devil they came and to the Devil they’d go. The scene below is from Saints, page 580. Geoffrey and Henry have come to the French king’s court and Geoffrey outrages Bernard and Louis by dragging Louis’s seneschal, Giraud Berlai, before them in chains. Since Berlai was a rebel in Geoffrey’s eyes, he was not impressed by the French king’s indignation and says coolly that he showed admiral restraint in not hanging Berlai. When Bernard warns him that his mockery is offensive to God, Geoffrey corrects him, saying his mockery is offensive to Bernard and he is not the sole interpreter of the Almighty’s Will. It rapidly goes downhill from there. When Bernard grudgingly offers to absolve Geoffrey from his “sin of disobedience” and lift the sentence of excommunication, Geoffrey responds:
“I have no intention of releasing Berlai, my lord abbot. The man is a rebel and brigand, and I see it as no sin to punish him as he deserves. But if it is a sin, then I have no wish to be absolved of it. Since you claim to have God’s ear day and night, you may tell Him that for me, that I seek no absolution for an act of simple justice.”
When Geoffrey began to speak, Bernard stiffened, righteously indignant that his olive branch should not only have been spurned, but snapped in half. By the time Geoffrey was done, though, he was speechless with horror. So were the French king and most of the onlookers, for Geoffrey’s defiance sounded to them like the worst sort of blasphemy.
(omission)
If Geoffrey had an innate sense of the dramatic, so, too, did Bernard. Drawing himself up to his full and formidable height, he thrust out his arm as if he meant to impale Geoffrey upon it. “’Be not deceived, for God is not mocked, and whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.’ You have prayed for damnation and the Lord God has heard you. Repent now, you impious, wicked man, whilst you still can. Heed me well, for I see your death if you do not, and within a month’s time.”
Bernard’s prophetic trances were known throughout France, and this one sent a frisson of uneasy excitement shuddering across the hall. The French king paled noticeably, some of Geoffrey’s own men began to edge away from him, while others moved in for a better view, just in case the Lord chose to take His vengeance here and now. Henry could not help admiring the abbot’s theatrical flair, but he was suspicious of the prophecy itself, for the timing was too convenient to be credible. Geoffrey looked even more skeptical; one of his eyebrows had shot upward in a familiar gesture of disbelief.
“A month, you say? Could you be more specific, my lord abbot? If you can give me the exact date, that would make it easier for me to plan Berlai’s public hanging in the time I have left.”
The abbot stared at the younger man and then slowly and deliberately made the sign of the cross. “It is true what men say, that the counts of Anjou come from the Devil’s seed. You blaspheme as easily as you breathe, mock all that is holy, you have no shame—“
“And I am doomed, too; let’s not forget that. How good of you to speak up for the Lord like this. Whatever would He do without you?” The abbot sucked in an outraged breath, but Geoffrey gave him no chance to respond. “Well, then, if I have so little time left, I see no reason to waste any more of it here.” And without a warning, without another word, Geoffrey turned on his heel and stalked from the hall.
* * *
His abrupt departure created a sensation and even Henry was taken aback, for that had not been in the script. He was not sure if he should stalk out, too, stay and try to salvage the peace talks, or make a measured, dignified withdrawal. He chose the latter, courteously bidding farewell to the French king and the abbot. But then he moved toward the stunningly beautiful woman who’d entered the hall just moments before.
* * *
“Madame,” he said gravely, and kissed her hand with a courtly flourish. But then he added, for her ears alone, “If you are not the Queen of France, by God, you ought to be.”
Her mouth put Henry in mind of ripe peaches. It curved at the corners, not quite a smile, but enough to free a flashing dimple. “My lord duke.” Her voice was as arresting as her appearance, low-pitched and sultry. “And if you are not yet the King of England,” she murmured, “by God, you will be.”
* * *
And that, of course, was the first meeting between Henry Fitz Empress and Eleanor of Aquitaine. One of my Facebook readers said he thought that was one of history’s great pickup lines, which amused me enormously. Geoffrey did not storm off as he threatened, and even agreed to some of the concessions demanded of him, at Henry’s urging, for by then he and Eleanor were making their own plans for the future. But none of them could have expected what happened next. On his way back to Anjou, Geoffrey caught a chill after swimming in the river at Chateau-du-Loir, and was dead within days. He was only thirty-nine and I do not doubt it vexed him greatly that Abbot Bernard would be able to claim that he’d foretold Geoffrey’s sudden, premature death. But if the abbot thought Henry would be intimidated by that eerie coincidence, he did not know his Angevins. Henry and Eleanor were made of sterner stuff than that and there is no evidence that even Bernard’s subsequent canonization impressed them very much.
9 likes ·   •  11 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 19, 2013 06:29
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by David (new)

David Elkin AS always, you post great tales. You mentioned earlier of how much history would have been different if Geoffrey lives.

I do like the official website from the UK: http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheM...

From Wiki you get mentioned in Geoffrey article: (I will have to track down the 1978 BBC series)

"Geoffrey was portrayed by actor Bruce Purchase in the 1978 BBC TV series The Devil's Crown, which dramatised the reigns of his son and grandsons in England.

Geoffrey is an important character in Sharon Penman's novel When Christ and His Saints Slept, which deals with the war between his wife and King Stephen. The novel dramatizes their stormy marriage and Geoffrey's invasion of Normandy on his wife's behalf."

I absolutely love your book on that period.


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Thank you, David. And thank you, too, for letting me know that Saints is mentioned in the Wikipedia article; I didn't know that. In fact, I still remember how dumbfounded I was when someone told me that I had a Wikipedia entry of my own. I'd never even thought to look, and zipped over to see--only to find out that it was inaccurate, claiming I wrote about purely fictional characters with real people occasionally interacting with them. I didn't do anything about it, but someone must have complained, because the next time I checked, it had been corrected. Wikipedia is such a mixed bag. Some of the entries are very accurate and reveal a sophisticated understanding of the topic, whereas others are downright pitiful. But it is a great way to begin a search, for it usually lists sources at the bottom of the entry and they can open the door for further research.


message 3: by Therese (new)

Therese How fitting that you wrote this today, although there is no reason you shouldn't perhaps it was more fitting that I finished it last night and wrote my review today. Excellent book! I learned so much and yet was still entertained since fiction and nonfiction were woven together so wonderfully.


message 4: by Charlene (last edited Aug 20, 2013 08:51AM) (new)

Charlene Did the deadline dragon eat your calendar? ;) I must confess I haven't read Saints yet. I promise I will get to it! I seem to be reading more non-fiction about 12th/13th century Lincolnshire at the moment and politics and personalities in general during Richard's captivity. And I do love your posts about events during this time period, so much so that I dabble with writing them on my own blog from time to time. (And if it's inappropriate for me to mention that, do let me know!)


message 5: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Not at all inappropriate, Charlene! In fact, if you are writing of medieval events, please feel free to post the link here. I'd be interested in checking them out and I am sure other readers would, too.


message 6: by Charlene (new)

Charlene Sharon wrote: "Not at all inappropriate, Charlene! In fact, if you are writing of medieval events, please feel free to post the link here. I'd be interested in checking them out and I am sure other readers wou..."

Thank you, Sharon. I'd actually posted today about the massacre at Acre, http://charlenenewcomb.com/2013/08/20... and thought surely you'd be posting about it yourself. I'll keep my fingers crossed that you don't spot any historical inaccuracies if you read my post!


message 7: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Normally I would, Charlene, but I'm still locked in mortal combat with the Deadline Dragon, so my on-line time has been seriously curtailed.


message 8: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca I do not understand how anyone can not love history? It's so interesting no matter what particular time one chooses to focus on; there is always something new to learn.

But these days most people are fascinated with the Kardashions(why? what do they do but shop & bicker?)And now I think Big Brother is back *rolls eyes* then there's the Essex show *big yawn*....But if I mention the Plantagenet's most people they I'm talking about salted peanuts! Go figure.....Sorry rant over. lol


message 9: by Charlene (new)

Charlene Rebecca wrote: "these days most people are fascinated with the Kardashions(why? what do they do but shop & bicker?)And now I think Big Brother is back *rolls eyes* then there's the Essex show *big yawn*..."

Agh! So true, Rebecca. Don't get me started. It's sad that the tv industry looks to produce cheap reality shows when they should be enriching all our lives with quality programming (including period dramas - always nice when there's a good degree of accuracy in them though)! Sharon - any chance we might see Lionheart and Ransom on the big (or little) screen?


message 10: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Probably not, Charlene. A shame, because Richard's story was made for Hollywood or the BBC. The man could not cross the street without encountering high drama of some sort.


message 11: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca I agree with you Charlene and two of my favourite drama's were Cranford(loved it) and now Downtown Abbey a firm favourite. I didn't mind the Tudors as entertainment only.

I also love Game of Thrones, but, what spoils it for me is the voilence and gratuitious sex scenes(the same with The Tudors). When you have good writing, excellent actors and a gripping story you don't need to go OTT with the above mentioned.

But I think all in all it is the writing that counts.

Which brings me to my main point--Why is Sharon's books overlooked? When the likes of GRRM has stated that he has been inspired by SKP's works? It doesn't make sense to me at all!

I'd love to see Sharon's version of The Plantagenets being made into a ether a TV series or a movie. I'd also love to see the Welsh trilogy brought to the TV screen...but for some reason even though other authors are inspired by her works it seems Hollywood is blind....I really don't get it....*scratches head*


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.