date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Sep 08, 2013 04:26PM
Agreed. Sci-fi technology needs to be handled in a matter-of-fact way.
reply
|
flag

Exactly, and yet it is a common thing. I've had a conversation with another sci-fi writer who was trying to explain readers a teleportation device going down to 'invent' a new boson particle and its force field and how it interacted with the our vector bosons. I tried to politely tell him he was crazy :)
An exception would be where, in the course of the story, a character invents a new device. My brother wrote a time travel novel that started with the scientist inventing the machine. There was a little bit of (necessary) explanation there...

Definitely, because it would be new even for the characters in the story. If some details are crucial to be revealed, I'd suggest also the use of a minor character and share a snippet of the information to the reader via a dialogue, e.g., an expert 'explaining' to another character, or to a child. Anything but spending paragraph after paragraph to describe details the writer believes they are 'needed' for the reader to 'believe' the story.