The many ways in which the French gov't is dead wrong to pay ransom for hostages

During the summer, the Best Defense is in
re-runs. Here are some favorites that ran in late 2012 and in 2013. This item originally
ran on Feb. 11, 2013.

Vicki
Huddleston, a former U.S. ambassador to Mali, says that the French government paid
$17 million to ransom French nationals in recent years. She further alleges
that these payments funded al Qaeda-linked operations in Africa.

The
French are wrong to do this. Not just mildly wrong, but massively wrong. Not
only are they funding terrorism, they are increasing the chances that their
people will be nabbed.

I say
this as someone who feared getting kidnapped in Baghdad. This was at a time
when Iraqi criminals supposedly were nabbing people and then selling them to al
Qaeda. I was once in a group of reporters summoned to the Green Zone for a
briefing from an American security official. He informed us that Baghdad was
the most dangerous city in the world, that we were the most lucrative targets
in the city, and that he thought we were nuts. Thanks fella!

Bottom
line: I felt that my best defense was the U.S. government policy of not paying
kidnappers. I still do.