'Ruthless' in handling sexual assault? Let's take some lessons from our allies

By Donna McAleer

Best Defense guest
columnist 

One would think that when the Joint Chiefs of Staff and
members of their staffs took their seats in the Senate
Armed Services Committee (SASC) hearing on June 4, 2013, they would come armed with
statements promising change and detailing actions being implemented. But,
instead of being like Lt.
Gen. David Morrison,
chief of staff of the Australian Defense Force, who inspirationally went bare knuckles on the issue, stating in a video distributed to his command and his country,
and posted on YouTube, "I will be ruthless in ridding the Army of people who
cannot live up to its values," our chiefs can't even talk a good fight!

At the June 4 SASC hearing they delivered confessions of
failure (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey: "We
have become too complacent." Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno: "We
have failed in our efforts to date to fully protect our soldiers, civilians,
family members from sexual assault and sexual harassment within our ranks."), apologies, and, most
astonishingly, ignorance of what the militaries of our allies
have done and are doing to address the issue. When questioned by Sen. Roy
Blount how U.S. allies had dealt with sexual assault, since the problem has
been known for years, Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, responded that
was "something I should have done."

Unlike the militaries in Australia, Canada, Israel,
Germany, the United Kingdom, and most of our NATO allies, who no longer allow
unit commanders to determine the prosecution of sexual assault cases, American
military law requires that the officers directly in command of individuals
charged with sexual assault offenses decide how the cases are handled. The
result is that only 8 percent of military sexual assault cases are prosecuted
and only two percent are convicted. Even after admitting the failure of the
present system, and after President Barack Obama in his graduation address at Annapolis and Secretary of
Defense Chuck Hagel in his commencement speech at
West Point made calls for action on the issue, the joint chiefs unanimously
supported keeping that present system in place.

And, despite acknowledging the problem, SASC Chairman Sen.
Carl Levin refused to support SASC member New York Sen. Kirsten
Gillibrand's Military Justice Improvement Act, which has 27 bipartisan
co-sponsors. That legislation proposes a reformation of the military justice
system and removes the court martial conveying authority on issues of sexual
assault from unit commanders and places responsibility in the hands of the
military's own professional legal corps. Instead, Levin replaced Gillibrand's
legislation with his own amendment: If unit commanders decide not to prosecute
servicemembers for alleged sexual assaults, those cases would be required to
undergo "an independent review by the next higher level of the chain of
command."

Since the 1991 Tailhook scandal in which Navy pilots were
accused of sexually abusing female officers at a Las Vegas convention, the
armed forces have put in place numerous policies and programs to reduce
assaults. Gen. John Amos, commandant of the Marine Corps, enumerates many
in his SASC
testimony. Yet,
two decades later, the problem persists. The 2012 Department of Defense "Annual
Report on Sexual Assault in the Military" indicates that 3,374 cases were
officially reported. The Pentagon itself estimates that more than 26,000 incidents
of sexual assault actually occurred in 2012, not the 3,374 officially reported.

So what happens next? Sexual assaults, notoriously
underreported crimes (in fairness, a problem in the civilian world as well) are
likely to remain that way -- underreported.

What is the good news? The legislative framework is set up
for implementation in 2016. Why 2016? Because a new panel
commissioned to begin a year-long process of researching and collecting more
data on sexual assault in the military convenes on July 1, 2013. Their findings are due in 12 months, on July 1, 2014. Interestingly, that is nearly three weeks
after the 2014 SASC hearing. Therefore, the earliest this legislation can
be proposed again for inclusion in the National Defense Authorization Act, the defense spending bill, is 2015
for inclusion and implementation in 2016. That is unless new legislation
is proposed directly on the Senate floor.

So, I guess we need to tell all the victims of sexual
assault to "just suck it up" for another three years.

The shame of it is that the militaries of Australia, Great
Britain, Israel, and others are leading the fight to rid their ranks of those
who, as Lt. Gen. Morrison said, "behave in a way that demeans or exploits their
colleagues." Our chiefs are not talking a good fight -- they are apologizing.

Donna McAleer is a West Point graduate, army veteran,
award-winning  author,  and speaker.