Here’s a fascinating question –

Should authors post reviews on Goodreads?


Heidi at Bunbury in the Stacks asks, in a post that was a nice surprise for me!


Anyway, Heidi points out that at least some readers disapprove and at least one author has quit posting reviews in response.


Isn’t that interesting? That never occurred to me.


It’s true that I nearly always post positive reviews about books I really enjoyed, because what if I ran into that author at a convention sometime? I would feel so uncomfortable if I had written a very negative review about his or her book!


Of course I’m not very likely at all ever to bump into Tana French, because I don’t think she is probably going to a lot of SFF conventions. But I actually did carefully avoid Myke Cole at last year’s WorldCon. I really did. So you can see why I hesitate to post many negative reviews!


On the other hand, when I post a glowing review, I really do mean it. Luckily so far all my writer-friends are very good writers whose books honestly do appeal to me! But you’ll notice I didn’t write a review of EMILIE AND THE HOLLOW WORLD, whereas I did for all of Martha Wells’ other books, and if you infer from this that I didn’t love EMILIE, well, what can I say? There are lots of books I don’t review, and that’ll be one of ‘em.


Oh, and can you BELIEVE that authors post five-star reviews of their OWN books on Goodreads? How tacky is that? Just sayin’.


Okay, I’m off to add Patrick Rothfuss and Phoebe North to my daily list of blogs to tour / reviews to track. Life’s too short!


1 like ·   •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 19, 2013 12:14
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Janet (new)

Janet I love having reviews from authors on goodreads! It's the easiest way to find new authors to like, because straight popularity contests like the listopia lists aren't so helpful. Hey, authors are readers too. And isn't asking authors not to review books on goodreads a bit like asking politicos in DC not to vote? Why wouldn't you want to include the opinions of more informed readers? One "like" is as good as another's, and no one's forcing anyone to read another person's review. Perhaps this is of more concern among bloggers and dedicated hobby reviewers, but I don't see the issue.

I do think authors have a responsibility to be more literate and specific than the blogosphere average, and to avoid the cutting sarcasm that can be so hurtful. All of the authors whose reviews I read do this.

By the way, while I think a multi-paragraph 5-star reivew would be tacky, most 5-star ratings that I see are simply from authors who don't know the goodreads platform as well and don't know how to list their books without being forced to give a rating. So not so nefarious.


message 2: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier I definitely agree that a more analytical and specific review is a great thing, and writers often write that kind of review. And thanks for pointing out why some authors might list-and-review their books on Goodreads; I hadn't thought of that, but you're right that that isn't tacky at all.


back to top