Maybe the problem at West Point is commanders coming from all-male units?

Anonymous

Best
Defense guest columnist

Some food for thought as questions about the Rugby team continue to surface...

Interesting to note that BG Rich Clark, 74th commandant of
cadets, West Point, has served and led almost exclusively in Ranger and infantry
units -- all male units. While this is not unusual for comm's at this
particular time, it is concerning given USMA is a mixed gender officer training
program.

The 75th Ranger Regiment is a lethal,
agile and flexible force, capable of conducting many complex, joint special
operations missions. Today's Ranger Regiment is the Army's premier
direct-action raid force. Each of the four geographically dispersed Ranger
battalions is always combat ready, mentally and physically tough, and prepared
to fight our country's adversaries.

The Rangers are somewhat of a self-selecting group. While
physically and mentally tough, if there is a problem with a soldier in a unit,
they typically get rid of the soldier. They are not about leadership and
character development, but developing physical and mental strength and
endurance.

Celebrated and extolled are his credentials...

Rich is a warrior-leader with
rock-solid credentials for competence and with a heart for Soldiers,"
Huntoon said. "He will excel as the commandant for cadets."

Is there a correlation between Rugby and Rangers?

Heard the faculty strongly opposed the comm's decision and
punishment saying it undermines the entire respect mentorship program. And how
were the rugby players' mentors selected? They volunteered as a query was sent
out.

Going for a trail run as I need some fresh air.