The New Yorker: “Thirteen Wives” by Steven Millhauser

CV1_TNY_05_27_13Juan.inddMay 27, 2013: “Thirteen Wives” by Steven Millhauser


I’m not sure I get this story, which you can read in its entirety for free. Go do that now: “Thirteen Wives.”


Here’s the gist of it. The speaker says he lives in a sprawling house and each of his thirteen wives has her own room. He then proceeds to describe each of the wives—listed by number, not name—and his relationship with her. All the wives are quite different; in fact, they seem to cover the universe of possible personality types, as if his wives represent all women. In contrast, we know very little about the personality of the man, except as he compares himself to each of the wives. But he is not every man—he is one man. Who, then, are the women?


As I read through all the different wives, I wondered if the narrator weren’t speaking really of just one woman, with moods or a split personality. (It’s not clear how they could play cards in small groups, as the narrator says they do, if that were the case.) It might be that the wives represent the same wife at different ages. In fact, wife number 10 is sick, and wife number 12 is a “negative woman,” as if she were really an absence, rather than a presence. And number 13 is his memory of women. He says, “ The incessant changefulness of my thirteenth wife may, of course, arise from something deceptive in her nature, as if she’s continually casting up new images in an effort to evade responsibility for any one of them,” which suggests that she is all the previous wives put together.


Millhauser is known for such slightly off-kilter, perplexing stories. As of this writing, there’s no Q&A with the author to help us with this one. So, what’s your take? Do you find this a sexist story?

 •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 20, 2013 17:33
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jin (new)

Jin Z I think this story is meant to be satirical, although not without sincerity. I don't think it's a sexist story, but the entire story is the projection of the narrator's male gaze. All the wives, none of whom has a voice in the story, are the objects of the gaze of the narrator, who is the subject without a form. This formlessness allows his gaze to represent the gaze of any man in this culture. But the story is more complicated than a polemic against gender inequality or male domination. There are many a moments that are written with such sincerity, which makes the narrator someone that many people, men or women, can sympathize with. Essentially, the story is a depiction of a fantasy for many men, and because it will never be real, it is ever more beautiful.


back to top