Why write for your branch journal? Because you can help your comrades

By Jason Fritz

Best Defense guest respondent

When
my copy of the January-March 2013 issue of The
CAVALRY & ARMOR Journal (the U.S. Cavalry and Armor Association version
of ARMOR Magazine) arrived in the mail a couple of weeks
ago, I was also a bit puzzled by the article titled "How to Eat Steak with a
Knife and Fork!"
Not only because the title motif "How to Eat X with Y" has become quite tired,
but because I expected it to be the beginning of an onslaught of "Armor Rulz!"
articles in future issues. Of course, reading the article you can see that it
is not a paean to maneuver warfare but rather is only a plug for three schools
offered by the Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, written by the
commander of those schools.

To
me the biggest issue was not that ARMOR
ran an article about "core competencies," but rather that the publishers used
valuable space in a branch journal to advertise schools that officers and NCOs
should be going to anyway. I do not share Tom's lament on the tactical focus of
ARMOR as it is a journal for armor
units, which are by definition brigades and below and therefore tactical
formations. But his post brings up a prevalent problem: the demise of the
branch journals.

Anyone
who subscribes to their branch journal has probably noticed this decline.
Articles are becoming repetitive. Issues are becoming thinner. I certainly
can't think of a single article in the past two years in ARMOR from which I felt I learned something. In the case of ARMOR, which was first published in
1888, this demise is ill-timed. For the first time in over a generation our
armor force has extensive and varied combat experience and we should not lose
these lessons.  And this is true for
every branch.  In an introduction to the
Association version of the issue that Tom linked to earlier in the week, MG (R)
Terry Tucker, former chief of Armor and current president of the U.S. Cavalry
& Armor Association, wrote:

I
would like to take a moment to thank all who contribute to this Magazine and
participate in the important discussion of our Mounted Force. However, as
important as it is for our contributors to submit articles based on history, "tactics,
techniques and procedures," or personal experience, our mission challenges us
to exchange critical thought among our members. I believe we too often fall
short in this area in our Cavalry and Armor Journal and in ARMOR Magazine. We
want discussion, differing opinions, and even heated debate when appropriate.

Branch
journals may not be Foreign Affairs, Parameters, or even PRISM, but they are and have been the primary outlet for
professionals at the tactical level to disseminate, discuss, and debate their
tradecraft. Theirs being such a focused audience, you won't find academics
rushing to get published. That leaves it to those of us who have been there and
done it to keep these forums alive; you don't know who needs to know what you
know or what doors writing will open for you. I wrote one article for ARMOR in 2008 while I was still in the
Army. In addition to earning a free year's subscription to the magazine, this
article played a significant role in my securing my first job out of the Army.
The article, titled "Measuring Success in Counterinsurgency Warfare," has been
the publication prospective employers have invariably asked about first because
they recognize ARMOR and because they
are interested in the topic.  Recognizing
this success, I shouldn't have stopped at one article -- something I intend to
fix this year.

If
you are a commander in the force, find a way to incentivize your officers and NCOs
to write for their journal -- prospective writers need to know that writing is
valued in their organization.  Whether
you are a commander or not, submit articles to your branch's journal (make sure
you abide by their submission criteria). Get your good ideas and your name out
there and put it in print.  Branch
journals provide an opportunity for you to influence your community, work on
your writing skills, and maybe help someone who needs the information or idea
you're holding on to.

Jason Fritz served
as an armor officer in the U.S. Army for six years. He is now a defense
consultant focusing on land power issues and a contributor to the Ink Spots security blog.