Bahrain’s Formula One again the only controversial race
The former world champion Damon Hill has challenged Jean Todt, the president of Formula One’s ruling body the FIA, to make his position clear on the controversial Bahrain Grand Prix in April. The Guardian and their counter parts constantly address the race in Bahrain while failing to mention or to question the ethics of the likes of Damon Hill who find no cause for concern with human rights issues elsewhere.
Last year it was the GRID with “Do you think F1 should race in Bahrain”. In the process and despite races prior to the Bahrain F1 they did not launch “Do you think F1 should race in Australia(In a wealthy and prosperous nation, aboriginal people live in third world conditions), or Malaysia(where people are arrested for protesting electoral reform) or China(where artists are arrested and activists disappear)” And let’s not forget the land of the free and Americas deplorable human rights records.
So ask yourself, are you going to cancel the F1 altogether?
Every year Bahrain has been the prime target of such discussions and condemnation based once again on the bias mass media and organisations that label themselves as human rights and each year the same people seem to fall for it. While The Guardian is concerned about the race, they raised no concerns or article on a foiled terrorist attempt although the rest of the media managed to articulate the four arrests.It seems The Guardian follows the same pattern as Al Wefaq who made no mention of the recent attacks .
To understand a little more of how Al Wefaq and their human rights representatives operate read Human rights all wrong and how highly critical false information that was presented to the United Nations has yet to be retracted.
The NGO’s followed by the mass fooled media have become a monopoly for these representatives that only provide their side of news and views without any interest in anyone else that opposes them. If they followed any ethics at all they would realize if they don’t believe in freedom of expression for people they despise, they don’t believe in it at all.
It is a well known fact by now that the majority of these international human rights associations have the same members in each and everyone of their organisations especially when you look at the representatives and advisers on the Middle East. The same names with the same agenda.
It seems we live in an era where people are spoon fed and believe all that they read without looking at both sides and without actually researching the names in each of these organisations that disseminate information. Go and look up the NGO’s and look at the general secretary names or board members and you will find same names pop up with their own bias one sided political not really human rights agenda.
Bahrain has been through enough and this constant hypocritical approach to corner Bahrain is completely unjustified.
