How Amazon could Improve Book Reviews

English: Portrait of Yellow-headed Amazon Parr...
Happy with the quality of book reviews on Amazon? Do you read them before deciding on a book purchase - or even to just download a sample? Or do you go to the list of the top hundred best selling titles in the genre you like and stop there?



I suspect most people go to Amazon to buy a book they've heard about on Goodreads, generally considered the best book review site, or perhaps read about in the papers or a blog. If that's the case, it's a pity because Amazon has done a lot to make book pages as informative as possible. There's plenty of good stuff to be found on a book page, ranging from customer reviews neatly ranked by stars (one star = "I hate it" to 5 stars = "I love it") to lists of books purchased by other customers ("Customers who bought this item also bought..."), not to mention "highlights and notes" and forums and all sorts of goodies...



To Amazon's eternal credit one should point out that the book's sales ranking is hidden in the "book details" while customer reviews are in the forefront, like this (I took here the case of one of my books):











Yet there are problems with reviews and Amazon is well aware of them. Recently, the Big Zon went on the war path against reviews by family and friends and pulled down the so-called "sock puppet" reviews - in the process making many people angry because it took aim at reviews done by writers in the same genre. That was no doubt an error - it is standard practice in the publishing industry to ask for reviews from "people in the know", literary critics who are experts in
the genre and recognized authors working in the same genre. One may expect Amazon to recant and return to a more reasonable stance on reviews.



But there is no doubt that the review system is not perfect and could be vastly improved. With its technical capability, Amazon ought to be able to improve the standard review done by readers who are neither literary critics nor expert authors, just people who love to read. True, Amazon has set up review guidelines that are very clear and readable but I'm not sure many people look at them before posting their reviews.



Surely, a more "guided process" could be electronically set up. For the time being, the star ranking is entirely subjective: you're asked to assign stars on the basis of an overall like/dislike, no need to provide supporting evidence for your choice. Instead of clicking on the stars to establish the ranking, why not ask a few simple questions in either a pop-up window or a drop-down menu that would "guide" the number of stars awarded, ensuring that all the main features of a novel are taken into account?



Let's take the case of fiction (obviously different questions would need to be developed for non-fiction): we all know that a novel's quality is based on a number of aspects, the same for all novels: the quality of character development, plot, setting etc. One could take, for example, the 8 points that the judges on the  SLO NightWriters Contest use to evaluate entries:

1)Beginning/Ending,  

2)Character,
 

3)Dialogue,  

4)Narrative Voice & Point of View,  

5)Description of
Setting, 

6)Emotional Impact,  

7)Plot / Story Arc,  

8)Use of Language.



My proposal is simple enough: ask readers to rate the book on a scale of 5, from bad = 1 to excellent = 5 for each of the above points, and once all the aspects are rated, poof! There you have it, it's electronic magic,  your 5 star rating would be all done, synthesizing all 8 points! Ok, perhaps 8 points to score a book are too many and could be reduced to 4 or 5, but something like that would force people to think before assigning stars and make the whole rating system a lot more objective and based on observation. The very same points should also help readers in writing up their review, drawing their attention to the criteria they should refer to when passing judgment.



One additional plus: if Amazon does this well, it could even be fun to watch the results of one's choices translate in a particular number of stars...



This is just a modest proposal to improve the quality of book reviews on Amazon, a simple electronic tweak but it might work wonders to make the system more reliable as a guide to book discovery. Because, when all is said and done, book reviews, aside from word of mouth, remain the single biggest tool for discovering new good reads!



What do you think of this idea? What other suggestions would you have to improve Amazon's book review system?





Related articles

What Are The Best Book Review Sites?(makeuseof.com)



Group looks to create Rabble, an aggregated book review site for indie and traditional books(teleread.com)



Goodreads Reviewed: A Must-Use Site For Any Book Lover(makeuseof.com)






Enhanced by Zemanta
1 like ·   •  11 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 04, 2013 07:48
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lee (new)

Lee Holz Your critique is well placed. However, not wanting to discourage ordinary readers from writing reviews, I would make the "guided" rating process voluntary rather than mandatory. I find reading amazon reviews useful in selecting books to read. True, some are nearly useless, but, if there are a fair number of reviews (say six or more), I find I can get a pretty good feel for the quality of the book by reading them all. I agree that Goodreads reviews are, on the whole, better.


message 2: by Claude (new)

Claude Forthomme Lee wrote: "Your critique is well placed. However, not wanting to discourage ordinary readers from writing reviews, I would make the "guided" rating process voluntary rather than mandatory. I find reading amaz..."

Lee, I just meant a guided process for assigning the stars - not for writing the review which, I agree with you, should always be left to the individual!


message 3: by Lee (new)

Lee Holz Claude, I know what you meant. I would still make the process voluntary because in amazon's setup you have to do a rating to leave a review and I wouldn't want to see doing a rating made more difficult.


message 4: by Claude (new)

Claude Forthomme Lee wrote: "Claude, I know what you meant. I would still make the process voluntary because in amazon's setup you have to do a rating to leave a review and I wouldn't want to see doing a rating made more diffi..."

It all depends how Amazon does it - should be done visually, in the form of a fun game so as to entice readers to play with it and see the number of stars change as they themselves click a different number for each criterion. To give the option to use it or not to use it would make it incredibly difficult to pull off visually and would ensure the idea would be stillborn!


message 5: by Claude (new)

Claude Forthomme Claude wrote: "Lee wrote: "Claude, I know what you meant. I would still make the process voluntary because in amazon's setup you have to do a rating to leave a review and I wouldn't want to see doing a rating mad..."

And Lee, please, please, make your comments directly on the blog! Your comments are so interesting but they are getting lost here, practically no one reads my blog on Goodreads - whereas on the Net I get between 650 and 800 pageviews per day! That's close to 20,000 pageviews per month - do add yourself there, you will be far more visible! And you will see what other people are saying about my proposal, it's an eye-opener!


message 6: by Lee (new)

Lee Holz Claude, I shy away from sites where I have to sign away my first born to become a subscriber.


message 7: by Claude (new)

Claude Forthomme Lee wrote: "Claude, I shy away from sites where I have to sign away my first born to become a subscriber."

Ha ha! Heavens, Lee, my site is public! You don't have to sign anything to read it or comment! I don't even have a no-spam barrier...


message 8: by Lee (new)

Lee Holz Give me the link again, Claude. My recollection is that the last time I commented I had to do so anonymously. Otherwise, I had to provide too much info. I don't object to leaving an email address to get notices of new posts a la GR.


message 9: by Claude (new)

Claude Forthomme Lee wrote: "Give me the link again, Claude. My recollection is that the last time I commented I had to do so anonymously. Otherwise, I had to provide too much info. I don't object to leaving an email address t..."

My blog is hosted by Google (Blogger) and it's terribly standard - but I know some people hate Google (though I'm not one of them) yet I don't think they try to get that much out of you. Though you're welcome to comment anonymously if your prefer...The link is: http://claudenougat.blogspot.com

Hope to see you there, my anonymous friend!


message 10: by Lee (new)

Lee Holz OK, will do. Problem is I hate all things Google except searches. I guess I'll get notices of your posts via GR and then two clicks will take me to your blog site.


message 11: by Claude (new)

Claude Forthomme Lee wrote: "OK, will do. Problem is I hate all things Google except searches. I guess I'll get notices of your posts via GR and then two clicks will take me to your blog site."

Right! I'll be very happy to see you there!


back to top