date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Lee
(new)
Mar 09, 2013 09:35AM
Your critique is well placed. However, not wanting to discourage ordinary readers from writing reviews, I would make the "guided" rating process voluntary rather than mandatory. I find reading amazon reviews useful in selecting books to read. True, some are nearly useless, but, if there are a fair number of reviews (say six or more), I find I can get a pretty good feel for the quality of the book by reading them all. I agree that Goodreads reviews are, on the whole, better.
reply
|
flag
Lee wrote: "Your critique is well placed. However, not wanting to discourage ordinary readers from writing reviews, I would make the "guided" rating process voluntary rather than mandatory. I find reading amaz..."Lee, I just meant a guided process for assigning the stars - not for writing the review which, I agree with you, should always be left to the individual!
Claude, I know what you meant. I would still make the process voluntary because in amazon's setup you have to do a rating to leave a review and I wouldn't want to see doing a rating made more difficult.
Lee wrote: "Claude, I know what you meant. I would still make the process voluntary because in amazon's setup you have to do a rating to leave a review and I wouldn't want to see doing a rating made more diffi..."It all depends how Amazon does it - should be done visually, in the form of a fun game so as to entice readers to play with it and see the number of stars change as they themselves click a different number for each criterion. To give the option to use it or not to use it would make it incredibly difficult to pull off visually and would ensure the idea would be stillborn!
Claude wrote: "Lee wrote: "Claude, I know what you meant. I would still make the process voluntary because in amazon's setup you have to do a rating to leave a review and I wouldn't want to see doing a rating mad..."And Lee, please, please, make your comments directly on the blog! Your comments are so interesting but they are getting lost here, practically no one reads my blog on Goodreads - whereas on the Net I get between 650 and 800 pageviews per day! That's close to 20,000 pageviews per month - do add yourself there, you will be far more visible! And you will see what other people are saying about my proposal, it's an eye-opener!
Lee wrote: "Claude, I shy away from sites where I have to sign away my first born to become a subscriber."Ha ha! Heavens, Lee, my site is public! You don't have to sign anything to read it or comment! I don't even have a no-spam barrier...
Give me the link again, Claude. My recollection is that the last time I commented I had to do so anonymously. Otherwise, I had to provide too much info. I don't object to leaving an email address to get notices of new posts a la GR.
Lee wrote: "Give me the link again, Claude. My recollection is that the last time I commented I had to do so anonymously. Otherwise, I had to provide too much info. I don't object to leaving an email address t..."My blog is hosted by Google (Blogger) and it's terribly standard - but I know some people hate Google (though I'm not one of them) yet I don't think they try to get that much out of you. Though you're welcome to comment anonymously if your prefer...The link is: http://claudenougat.blogspot.com
Hope to see you there, my anonymous friend!
OK, will do. Problem is I hate all things Google except searches. I guess I'll get notices of your posts via GR and then two clicks will take me to your blog site.


