Specific Military Cuts Were Chosen by Panetta, Not "Forced" by Sequester

The NYT reported on cuts in military spending that Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said could happen if the sequester goes into effect on March 1. The NYT referred to these cuts as "forced," implying that they were required by the sequester.


This is not accurate. The sequester requires a cut in military spending of approximately 6 percent. The specific cuts chosen presumably reflects the fact that Mr. Panetta views the items to be the least important to the country's defense. Alternatively,...

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 07, 2013 02:14
No comments have been added yet.


Dean Baker's Blog

Dean Baker
Dean Baker isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Dean Baker's blog with rss.