date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ashley
(new)
Jan 22, 2013 01:13AM

reply
|
flag

1. Not all books that people are buying are eBooks. Most people don't want to stand around in Books-A-Million, reading 30 or 40 pages of a hardback book, before buying it.
Also, if an eBook is FREE on Amazon, I do not see a problem with just going ahead and downloading it without reading a sample. If you later read 30 pages of it, and do not like it, then you can delete it.
2. A majority of people, self-inclusive, use Goodreads to keep up with what we have read and what we thought/felt about the books we have read. Having those reviews there helps us remember what authors/series we did/didn't like.
That way, if Jane/Joseph Doe releases a new book in April 2015 that I think I'd like, I can look that author up, and see that I did not finish the last book I read by them in 2013.
Also, I think that reviewing books we did-not-finish helps authors to know what we did not like about it. That way, if they see that a lot of people did-not-finish it for the same reason, they can change things around next time around.
----------------
But, I do highly agree with when you said to never go into a book with high expectations of it being just like any other *Best Selling Book of the Year* that it has been compared to in reviews.
Also, I might add, people should not expect every book to be "just as awesome" as the book before it or "the most awesome" book of the series. That way, they'll sometimes be let down as well, since every book is different in its' own way. And, I quite like it that way.
--------------------
Thanks for the entry. I have enjoyed reading your entries on here.

For free books, absolutely fine to treat like a sample. The question is, should the reader who downloaded for free 8 cookbooks, 4 self-help books, and one young adult novel, review the YA novel if they only read 5 pages and decide it is not for them? There's a lot of book hoarding that goes on with the free books. After my last 3 free-day period, my customers also bought list was hysterical. Out of 20 pages, there were only a handful of books in the same genre (yoga, cooking, why you married an idiot, & all kinds of fun stuff). I guess that is where expectations come in? If you give something a chance because it is free (if outside your typically read genre), maybe do exactly that? Give it a chance. If you don't like, no harm, no foul since you didn't pay for it. If the book is in your genre of choice, I think it's fair game to review.
I have downloaded a number of free books lately that had very high review ratings on Amazon. I'm not going to lie. Most... not so great and I haven't been able to get through. Not going to rate them.
From a reader's perspective I agree on point #2. As an author, I'm no longer able to do that? Unfortunately there's backlash for disliking books openly. I try to read samples first to avoid reading anything I wouldn't like. But occasionally I'm asked to read something or I give something a chance based on the sample, and I don't like the book. So, I choose to withhold my opinions if they are harsh (or if I simply can't remember enough about the book to rate or review well). I mark as read, but give no rating in either of these instances, so that it will jog my memory for the future. I don't like every book I read (not even close), so I can empathize when people don't like mine. I'm just making a personal choice not to bash other people's work, since I can appreciate that other people may enjoy it. If that makes any sense...
While I still don't necessarily agree on reviewing books that a reader didn't finish, I understand what you are saying. If readers took the time to explain to authors the *why*, then yes, it would be helpful. Often, the readers do not include the 'constructive criticism' portion of the review. They'll either a) leave a negative rating with no feedback (which accomplishes part 1 of your statement and will remind them that they didn't like that particular author's work... which could also be accomplished by putting in a folder marked 'did not finish' or 'did not like'), or b) they give vague or sometimes, even mean, statements that will do more to damage an author's ego than to help their writing.
This isn't always the case. Someone recently did take the time to write a review on my book saying they were confused and chose not to finish the book. That does give me valid information. Of course, in this case, I chose to write my book in such a way that the reader has to piece together things as they go along. But, I can empathize with the reader that didn't want to wait it out to get a clear picture. Do I think she should have rated the book? Honestly, that's her choice, not mine, no matter what my opinions might be on the matter.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter what I think. People will and should follow their own conscience on these matters. If someone feels good about themselves after going through and giving 1 star rating to a bunch of books they haven't read... ultimately that's their deal. If someone chooses to rate a bunch of books they only read a few pages of, also their choice. If people want to read books without reading the samples first, again, their choice. I can only speak for me... that it has saved me time and money to read samples first, and that I ultimately have a cleaner conscience by not bashing stuff that other writers have worked hard on. I am also choosing not to be offended when people do bash my work. I very much appreciate the nuggets of gold I find in constructive criticism (and honestly, have made changes based on recurrent themes... and am very grateful for the input). All *all* books have folks that don't like them, so I can surely empathize that there are people that don't get or don't like mine.
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to write up your thoughts, and to give me more food for thought. I appreciate it! I really don't think there is any one way of thinking here that is right or wrong--just what works for each individual person.
Megan
Holly wrote: "While I dearly appreciate your advice, I do disagree somewhat with some of it.
1. Not all books that people are buying are eBooks. Most people don't want to stand around in Books-A-Million, readin..."

Unfortunately, the bad thing you said here is true. There will be people that deliberately go around reading 10 or 15 pages of a book, so they can say they read part of it, just to give it a 1-star review. And, some will probably not read it at all before doing the same.
We just have to hope that the honest people outnumber the dishonest ones on Goodreads. And, I believe it does.
Myself, I hate when I have to give a book a truly bad review. I don't like sounding mad at or mean at people.

As for reading my book, don't feel obligated or compelled (and read the sample first ha ha). If after you read the sample you do want to read, I'm happy to send you a copy of the book. Just message me down the line if that's the case.
I really do appreciate you sharing your opinions on this! Have a great weekend!
Holly wrote: "You make good points. I hope I get a chance to read your book, later on, since talking here with you makes me extremely curious about it.
Unfortunately, the bad thing you said here is true. There ..."