I've blogged before about the
fallacy of understated evidence. Here I want to explore further how it applies to fine-tuning arguments.
Even if we assume that so-called cosmic "fine-tuning" is evidence favoring theism over naturalism, that argument commits the fallacy of understated evidence. In other words, even if the
general fact of fine-tuning is more probable on the assumption that theism is true than on the assumption that naturalism is true, it ignores other,
more specific facts about fine-tuning, facts that,
given fine-tuning, are more likely on naturalism than on theism.
Read more »
Published on January 18, 2013 15:03