Stephen King exposed: books not all his own work !

Following media suggestions that the late Dick Francis may not have penned many of his later novels, due to poor health if nothing else, and that they may in fact be the work of his wife, leveraging the Francis brand, the spotlight now falls on international best selling author Stephen King.

I have no independent corroboration of the media reports as regards Dick Francis, and if his wife did indeed write many of his books, she deserves enormous credit for her writing skills, and for eschewing personal public recognition.

But my source on the Stephen King expose is cast iron – it is no less than the great man himself. Yes, King now acknowledges he had help ! In his seminal book “On Writing” – the best book on writing I’ve ever read – King even acknowledges the role of his wife. It was his wife who rescued “Carrie”, his first and breakthrough novel later adapted to film, from the trash can. Here’s two messages from King’s book: the first draft is always crap (Hemmingway), and that good writing consists of mastering the fundamentals (vocabulary, grammar, and elements of style.)

Here’s where I’m going with this. Editing is key to good writing. If you doubt this look at King’s examples of his own work before and after editing. In fact I’m amazed at all the online debate as to whether writers need professional editing. But I’m not here to regurgitate the arguments why every writer needs a professional editor – it’s as self evident as it is that the greatest tennis player of all time, Roger Federer, needs a coach. I’m here to give you a reason I’ve not come across elsewhere: you need an editor to protect your own ego.

In my two year journey to publication, I engaged three established authors to review the manuscript, and three professional editors to help me improve it. Here’s what Matthew Branton, best selling author of “The Love Parade” (Bloomsbury 2002), said about the sex scenes in When the Siren Calls: “The sex scenes are another of your strengths -vital, pacy, and never gross or uncomfortable – as the annual Bad Sex Awards shows, this is rare in fiction.” Praise indeed from a best selling author.

Now are the sex scenes in my book to everyone’s taste? You bet they’re not. Some like them, some hate them, some may find them luke warm, some may even find them gross and uncomfortable. Each to their own as they say. But my ego is somewhat protected from criticism because I had professional input to the manuscript. The two most graphic sex scenes in the manuscript never made the cut because my editor convinced me they were inappropriate to the genre. Cutting out those sex scenes was a tough decision, and I’d never have done it without editorial advice, but I’ve no doubt now it was the right decision.

Trust me, if you are a writer and someone slates your work in a review, a professional or otherwise, you’ll feel a whole lot better about yourself and your work if you know it passed muster with professional reviewers and editors before hitting the printing press.
1 like ·   •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 08, 2013 23:19 Tags: authors, books, reviews, writing
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 2: by Elena (new)

Elena Ristic I apologize, I might be wrong, but how does the title of this relate to the actual text within?
I see now that it was written 7 years ago, but still.
You claim in the title 'Stephen King exposed', but then give two examples unrelated to the claim. I'm just curious.


message 3: by Paolo (new)

Paolo @Elena, I agree with you. The title is misleading. I believe the title is a clickbait and I think Tom Barry should edit it, even if it is an old article. He should do it, because the article still appears among the first Google results when typing “Does Stephen King write his own books”. As one can read on Quora, it is a widespread opinion that Stephen King does write his own books. So, this article can actually lead an inattentive reader to form the (false, IMO) belief that Stephen King has his books written by others. So, I suggest @Tom Barry change the title to this article. I understand this can be a type of irony, as in the end the article suggests that books should not be written by the author alone because the contribution of editors is fundamental. However, I tend to believe, as I said at the beginning, that this is a clickbait and that the author is attracting readers by wrongfully defaming a world famous author and a man who built his fortune from nothing, other than his own imagination. In addition, if irony was intended, the article should have, at least, referred to the title, saying something like “SK, so, does not write his own books, and he rightly does so. So did Hemingway. A good book, needs a second look, better if not from the same pair of eyes that wrote it”.

I thought Stephen King did not write his own books, but then reading opinions on Quora (which include an opinion by one person active in the literary field) I changed my mind. Stephen King might be sold to the media and sold to Hollywood and sold to the bad tastes of his public, but he does write his own books. So, I believe, after reading Quora opinions. The man deserves respect for that.

Indeed, I think he will be remembered in the history of literature as one of the most original (Horror genre) and prolific authors (number of novels and books containing short novels) of all time.

So, why spread false beliefs by creating article with misleading titles, undermining the credibility of a great writer and craftsman like Stephen King?

I suggest @Tom Barry change the title of this article, or, at least, reply to the request for clarification made by me now and, previously, by @Elena.


back to top