Explanation of Argument

The reason men and women in any type of close relationships argue is because neither of them has yet realized the correct path to the connection between them.  This may sound generic at first, but when dissected, it speaks volumes about the streams of thought that reflect through emotions in an argument. But first let me define close relationships: The basic idea consists of two creatures of whatever existence that feel bonded to each other through one or maybe even all of the four mediums of existence: trust, sex, intelligence, and happiness.  The odd one is happiness though, because the word happiness represents reaction, and therefore it is defined as a response to external forces and not a complete state of being according to my particular school of thought.  But after being so obviously necessary throughout the passage of time, it would not be a crime to suggest that happiness either directly or metaphorically has an effect on every form of existence in this universe.  That sentence may sound odd to you, and I certainly may be able to explain the first three mediums significantly better, but the fact remains that this feeling of joy, happiness, ecstasy, whatever you want to call it, is pretty much what every religion and following in the known world has been based on: the highest element of posterity.

Away from the flowery language, there are to the better of my discerning two basic forms of an argument: either a test of limits and slight dips into mental psychosis, hatred, ignorance, etc. or an expression of views tantamount to a common resolution.  In most cases the first variation is observed, and can lead to anything from breakups, prison, or even death.  It is the expression of perhaps the most primal emotion humans can understand; besides maybe love depending who you are.  It is the most dangerously empowering state of mind one can know, yet in one form or another guides entire civilizations.