date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Lee
(new)
Oct 26, 2012 09:17AM
All three. The thing about multiple reviews is they give one different takes on the book, the more the better. However, I will admit having been turned off a book by a negative review buried among glowing ones, usually a review that says the book is badly written, ungrammatical or very poorly edited.
reply
|
flag
Lee wrote: "All three. The thing about multiple reviews is they give one different takes on the book, the more the better. However, I will admit having been turned off a book by a negative review buried among ..."I agree with you Lee. I've been turned off by such reviews as well - in fact that 2 star rating is different: it's someone who doesn't like the main character - no doubt that person would hate Shakespeare's Othello too! So the content of the review, bottom line, matters more than the rating!
I guess all 3 reviews would entice me to read your book (which I will order today). However the 2-star rating confuses me, and also is illustrative of how off-target some reviews can be. Down-grading a book because a primary character is self-centered and selfish is like bad-mouthing the TV show Mad Men because Don Draper is self-centered and selfish. That's the main point of the show. The flawed character acts as a foil for all the other characters, and his actions move the story along.I find many low ratings are narrowly based on either a character the reviewer doesn't like, or a scene that is too violent, or even the misuse of a single word. This is insulting to the writer and does nothing to further the writer's career or improve his/her writing.
I read many books that might deserve a low rating but rather than rub the author's nose in it in public, I write the author directly via his/her email and make some suggestions that the author can do with as he/she pleases. I have received many wonderful responses from authors as a result of these emails. Isn't this much better than a reviewer taking a self-absorbed, sanctimonious position (yes, self-centered and selfish) and dumping on an author. That destructive approach might make the reviewer feel good but it certainly does nothing for the writer.
I share Joseph's point of view. However, I will dump publicly on a well-known author who writes poorly. There are plenty of them out there. Happily, for the most part I've managed to avoid their books in recent years.
Good distinction! But I have too little time to dis bad work (which I don't finish anyway), and would rather spend my time raving about work that I want to recommend to others, like The Honeymoon Assignment.
Thanks, Joseph. You have a valid point about not wasting time. That's why I have a Did Not Finish shelf.
Hey, Lee and Joseph, I guess we all agree and I love that Did Not Finish shelf: I'll have to add it!And if anyone feels like buying my book even on the basis of the 2 star review, I don't mind...But Joseph, you're right, it's rather insulting to writers. One of the best novels I ever read was Bazin's Vipère au Poing which depicts his mother - or at least the main character's mother - as the most vicious, inhumane of all mothers, the perfect reverse of (cliché) motherhood, making it in fact a remarkable, unforgettable book. In my view, it's one of the best French novels of the 20th century but sure, it's a tough read! You the reader come out of it feeling drained...
Joseph, I bought Hook too, but I want to read Twisted first. Also,if you haven't read it, don't miss Death on Facebook, a collection of really different and interesting stories.


