A chat with the Iranian foreign minister: He goes all amiable and reasonable, and wonders what all this fuss is about

By Nathan R. Sherfinski
Best Defense diplomatic bureau
In an hour-long conference call hosted by the Council on
Foreign Relations yesterday, Iranian Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Salehi
discussed a range of issues including: nuclear ambitions, Syria, and anti-American
sentiment. His tone was measured and
notably non-inflammatory.
Salehi, who received a PhD from MIT, described Iran as
acting with rational manner in its foreign policy. He dismissed concerns that
Iran's nuclear program is intended for anything aside from civilian energy
purposes. Salehi stated that Iran having
a nuclear bomb would neither make the region more stable nor make rational
sense. "Iran's possession of a nuclear
bomb would only invite attack and threaten other countries; it would not increase
security in the region," he stated in response to a question on the issue. He contended that energy diversification was
the sole purpose of Iran's nuclear program. Furthermore, he reaffirmed Iran's position as a signatory to the Treaty
on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Regarding Iranian support for Syria, he reiterated strict
opposition to foreign intervention of any kind and aimed to communicate Iran's
role in resolving the conflict. "The
Syrian people are entitled to democracy and freedom," he said. He went on to say, "We [Iran] have been in
talks with the opposition for at least a year." He contended that a political, not a military, solution is the key to
the issue and that Iran puts strong support behind U.N. efforts to resolve the
situation. "We [Iran] are on the same
wavelength with Brahimi, al-Arabi, and the quartet of countries," he
stated. He did draw a red-line in
Iranian support for the Syrian government. He asserted that, should the Syrian government use WMD, then Iran would
pull its support for the government and any country that would employ WMD,
"...loses legitimacy."
Salehi addressed the issue of anti-American sentiment,
saying, "Iran has great respect for the United States." While he noted that Muslims must stand up for
acts against the Prophet, he said that, "some went beyond what was
expected." He contended his country is
opposed to anti-Americanism or an "America-phobia," as he called it. He went on to say, "We [Iran] have no
animosity toward the United States."
Nathan R. Sherfinski is a researcher at the
Center for a New
American Security
.
Thomas E. Ricks's Blog
- Thomas E. Ricks's profile
- 436 followers
