10 Most Peculiar Things I Have Heard Since the Leicester Dig

As anyone who is reading this blog knows, last week, following an archaeological dig at Leicester, a skeleton was unearthed that may well prove to be that of Richard III. Needless to say, this has led to a flurry of online discussion about Richard and, of course, the age-old question of whether he was responsible for the deaths of his nephews.



This has generated some thoughtful commentary, but it has also generated some magnificently peculiar (or just stupid) statements, ten of which I have thoughtfully preserved below. Read ‘em and cringe.



Richard III was a martyr.
Henry VII had only a rudimentary command of English.
The bones found in the Tower and identified as those of the princes were actually those of chimps.
One of the sets of bones found in the Tower was that of a commoner with rickets. (How could they tell that the unclothed bones belonged to a commoner, you might ask? Presumably, he had a “C” carved into his skull.)
The skeleton found at Leicester shows signs of scoliosis; therefore, it cannot be Richard because the Tudors said that Richard had deformities, and anything the Tudors said about Richard was wrong.
Richard did not execute women or bishops; therefore, he could not have killed the princes. (Henry VII did not execute women or bishops either, but he of course is fingered as a prime suspect.)
Edward IV’s sons were not kept prisoners in the Tower because the Tower of London was not a “true prison” until Tudor times. (Among others, this would surprise Gruffudd ap Llywelyn, Roger Mortimer and his uncle, Eleanor de Clare,  Charles, Duke of Orleans, Edmund Beaufort, first Duke of Somerset, Edmund Beaufort, third Duke of Somerset, Henry VI, Margaret of Anjou, and Henry Holland, Duke of Exeter, all of whom were imprisoned there well before anyone started humming “Greensleeves.”)
Titulus Regius was Henry VII’s document overturning the Act of Succession.
The Leicester’s skeleton’s feet may have been chopped off because the grave was not the right length.
Richard III was the last English king.
9 likes ·   •  10 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 20, 2012 11:39
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Willow (new)

Willow LOL I think the last one really threw me off. I'm like huh???


message 2: by Susan (new)

Susan Thanks! They're definitely eyebrow-raisers!


message 3: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca Huston Oh good grief. You got to wonder sometimes.


message 4: by Susan (new)

Susan Rebecca, you certainly do. Marina, thanks!


message 5: by Rio (Lynne) (new)

Rio (Lynne) People really scare me. The skeleton belonged to a commoner? The bones belonged to chimps? The last king? Wow! Ignorance scares.


message 6: by Sabina (new)

Sabina Oh my! Some of these I've actually heard/read before; it's scary to think that if nonsense like this is repeated often enough it becomes fact (or at least "common knowledge").


message 7: by Orsolya (new)

Orsolya Chimps?!!!! A "C" in a "commoner's" skull? Wow... seriously? The dig is such an exciting moment in history and these ridiculous comments are discrediting the amzing value of it. People should be ashamed!


message 8: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne I was just thinking, in BBC's wonderful programm "History Cold Case" they can read a persons diet from the bones... perhaps they did that with the bones and found the diet did match a commoners diet rather than a royal diet? I have no other explanation for this surprising remark.....


message 9: by Susan (last edited Sep 21, 2012 09:56AM) (new)

Susan Suzanne wrote: "I was just thinking, in BBC's wonderful programm "History Cold Case" they can read a persons diet from the bones... perhaps they did that with the bones and found the diet did match a commoners die..."

Suzanne, there was no analysis of diet done on these bones back when they were examined in the 1930's. At that time, it was decided (perhaps rightly, perhaps wrongly) that the bones were those of the princes. They haven't been examined or tested since.


message 10: by Orsolya (new)

Orsolya I read that the current Queen Elizabeth has not allowed any examinations done on the (supposed) princes' bones. Basically, she won't give a "go ahead".


back to top