Writing In The Age Of Amazon And ePublishing . . . and a couple shameless plugs.

Things have changed a bit for me since my book got published. For one thing, I need to be more careful of what I say on line. Take Dan Caty, President of Chik-fil-A whose anti-gay statements earned him a boycott by my family. Had Mr. Caty kept his views to himself, he would still be the same anti-gay marriage person he is, but he wouldn’t be pillared by so many LGBT people and their supporters.  Lessons learned:  1) What people don’t know they can’t hold against you; and 2) if you’re selling something, be as Switzerland like as you can in your on-line life. Thank you Dan Caty.


What brought this up were two distinct events.  The first is a review – or rather a rating – I received on Goodreads for Second Shot. For those that have followed my writing, you know that this was my first attempt at a novel and I posted it, without any real editing, on Gay Authors to get feedback on how to improve.  Somehow it got listed on Goodreads and this week someone gave it 1 star.  Clearly this person didn’t like it, which is fine. I wish they’d have told me why, but in the end it doesn’t matter.  And from what I could tell of this person from their history, they have given more than a few 1 stars as well as 5s, 4s, 3s, & 2s.  It was not someone who joined up just to trash me.  So, while it’s a bit of a downer, it’s also a valid reflection of what a reader thought of the story. As the old adage goes, you can’t please everyone – Or can you. . . ?


The second reason event that got me thinking about the whole on line rating/review system is that I read an article about a guy who made $28,000 a month writing fake book reviews for author’s on Amazon.  Here’s the story. The jist is, for a fee, he’d see that your book twenty or more 5 stars. That way, however good or bad the book, it would appear to be fabulous and hopefully attract a bevy of new-i.e. real, booking buying- readers.  I can say that I’ve read a number of books lately that have good ratings and reviews and been less than thrilled by the content.  None lived up to the hype given.  So even if they weren’t the product of a paid fake reviewer, who’s to say they weren’t done by friends and family at the request of the author? 


The point is, how good/useful/accurate is the ‘peer’ review model that seems to rule the internet? Somehow because it’s ‘real’ people not professional reviewers giving the feed back, it’s supposed to be far better and more accurate than the old NY Times book review system.  I’m questioning this because it is so easy to manipulate these ratings.  Don’t think your rating is high enough? Get some friends to create an account and jack you up, or do it yourself, or better yet, do both.  Don’t like someone? Do the same in reverse and trash whatever they’re selling.  A 1 star rating can drag down someone’s rating more easily than a 5 star can pump it up. Getting on someone’s bad side can certainly negatively impact your rating.  And since a high peer review is necessary for getting sold, be as close to Switzerland as you can in your on line life, because you’re going to get enough 1 stars even without pissing people off. 


 


Okay shameless plugs for those who have made it this far:


 


First as you know, (Un)masked is out and available for sale. What you might not know is that the Goodreads M/M group is holding a fund raiser for a LGBT Youth organization one of the Moderators works with.  Anyta and I made a pledge to the M/M Romance Group Gives Back Charity Event tied to book sales of (Un)Masked. Basically for every book sold we’ll make a donation. Here’s a link to the Charity Event post, our pledge is the last post on the first page of the topic.  So if you’ve been thinking about buying the book, buy it in September because you’ll be helping a good cause too. [Not just my daughter's college fund. :P ]


 


Second, my nephew, Nicholas A. White, wrote a book.  He’s all of 20 and studying to be an engineer at Clemson. It is not a gay romance story, but it’s worth reading.  The book is called Forever In Carolina it’s available from Amazon and Barnes and Noble. If you need more of a reason to buy the book than to help out a first time author, he’s donating 20% of all profits from the book to Cancer Research.  Since it was self-published, he has a bit of upfront money to recoup, so help him out and buy the book if you can.


 


Last, if you read this – the few of you that do – a comment now and then would be great. I’m weird like that, I like to hear from folks reading.  Even if it’s to say this.


 


Thanks


 



2 likes ·   •  7 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 09, 2012 16:20
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Anyta (new)

Anyta Sunday hahaha, love the last link there. :P

Hiring book reviewers is dodgy--more than that, it's manipulative and wrong. :( It makes it difficult to navigate the books worth reading from the books that are not.

Oh well. I still believe there are enough good, honest people out there that write reviews worth reading and paying attention to!


message 2: by Emma Sea (new)

Emma Sea Speaking as a reader, I don't pay any attention to one star ratings with no reviews. It often means the rater has hit a pet peeve, and this can include encountering a m/m or LGBTQ book without expecting it.


message 3: by Ami (new)

Ami I agree with Sea. Actually, I don't pay attention to the ratings without some kind of explanation. The idea of readers place like Goodreads, is for a reader like me to read "opinion". Ratings don't mean a thing if there isn't any explanation for it. Like Sea said, 1-star could be because of pet peeves, or the reader feel that the story doesn't have value for money, and so on. It doesn't necessarily the story has low quality.


message 4: by Andrew (new)

Andrew Gordon Anyta, Sea, Ami,

Thanks for the comments.

Sea, Ami,I agree that seeing a one star - by itself, is somewhat meaningless. Especially on a site like Goodreads where the readers are a bit more sophisticated - i.e. they read the reviews from people, get to know them, get a feel for if they agree or disagree. And perhaps most importantly, Goodreads is a community where people can interact with each other and not be 'just a reviewer.' So there is a bit more heft to reviews here and you can rely on them more than say on Amazon.

But when I read the article it was clear that the 'reviewer' was of the belief that his barrage of positive reviews helped at least one author sell a million copies. That at least on Amazon, the higher your rating the better chance you have of being noticed. Again, I have no proof of this and it was just something I wondered and figured I see what others think. Your answers definitley reinforce the notion that getting the 'right' reviews is better than getting many reviews.

Thanks for commenting. :)


message 5: by Enny (new)

Enny I sometimes leave one star ratings without a comment because I'd rather read a good book instead of wasting even more time on some annoying book I already wasted my money on. As a reader I ignore all reviews and ratings by anyone except my friends whose tastes I know.


message 6: by Tailtiu (new)

Tailtiu Enny wrote: "I sometimes leave one star ratings without a comment because I'd rather read a good book instead of wasting even more time on some annoying book I already wasted my money on. As a reader I ignore all reviews and ratings by anyone except my friends whose tastes I know. "

I second that.


message 7: by Andrew (new)

Andrew Gordon Enny, Taitiu,

Thanks, these and the ones before yours are the type of comments I was trying to solicit with the post. Appreciate the input.

Andy


back to top