Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence (ECREE), Part 5: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Greg Koukl and Melinda Penner
In my first post
in this series, I offered a Bayesian interpretation of the principle, "extraordinary
claims require extraordinary evidence" (ECREE). Greg Koukl,
however, disagrees with ECREE. He recently explained why on his radio show (click here for audio); also, Melinda Penner, a member of Koukl's staff, has written on the issue here. In this post, I want to explain why I think Koukl's and Penner's objections to ECREE, like those of William Lane Craig and T. Kurt Jaros, are misguided.
Read more »[image error]
in this series, I offered a Bayesian interpretation of the principle, "extraordinary
claims require extraordinary evidence" (ECREE). Greg Koukl,
however, disagrees with ECREE. He recently explained why on his radio show (click here for audio); also, Melinda Penner, a member of Koukl's staff, has written on the issue here. In this post, I want to explain why I think Koukl's and Penner's objections to ECREE, like those of William Lane Craig and T. Kurt Jaros, are misguided.
Read more »[image error]
No comments have been added yet.
Keith Parsons's Blog
- Keith Parsons's profile
- 5 followers
Keith Parsons isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
