Index: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
"Part 1: The Bayesian Interpretation of ECREE": a Bayesian interpretation and defense of ECREE
"Part 2: Is ECREE False? A Reply to William Lane Craig": Craig's objection to ECREE is based upon an misinterpretation of ECREE.
"Part 3: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Kurt Jaros": ECREE emphasizes the common sense notion that the more implausible
(i.e., antecedently improbable) we initially regard a claim prior to
considering the evidence, the greater the evidence we will require to
believe the claim.
"Part 4: NT Reliability, Extraordinary Claims, and the Base Rate Fallacy": arguments for miracles based solely on the general historical reliability of the New Testament commit the base rate fallacy.
"Part 2: Is ECREE False? A Reply to William Lane Craig": Craig's objection to ECREE is based upon an misinterpretation of ECREE.
"Part 3: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Kurt Jaros": ECREE emphasizes the common sense notion that the more implausible
(i.e., antecedently improbable) we initially regard a claim prior to
considering the evidence, the greater the evidence we will require to
believe the claim.
"Part 4: NT Reliability, Extraordinary Claims, and the Base Rate Fallacy": arguments for miracles based solely on the general historical reliability of the New Testament commit the base rate fallacy.
No comments have been added yet.
Keith Parsons's Blog
- Keith Parsons's profile
- 5 followers
Keith Parsons isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
