II. The Logic of Comparison: Mastering Figurative Language

Figurative language is the engine of poetic meaning, an expressive and non-literal use of words that allows poets to transcend the limitations of direct statement. It is not merely a decorative "frill and flash" but an integral component of human communication, so deeply embedded in our daily speech and thought that its absence renders expression robotic and alien. This is a poetic device I firmly believe should be included in the “normal” writing syllabi as a very basic tenet of writing in any genre. When a poet employs figurative language, they are not simply saying what they mean in a more elaborate way; they are putting meaning into what they say, creating new layers of understanding through comparison, association, and imaginative leaps. This chapter will deconstruct the logic of comparison by examining the foundational division between tropes and schemes, before providing a detailed analysis of the core comparative figures of metaphor, simile, and personification.

p.s., don’t forget to subscribe now if you haven’t yet, so you can read the next installment on Rhythm (a deep dive into the sound and musicality of poetry).

2.1 Foundations: Tropes, Schemes, Tenor, and Vehicle

In classical rhetoric, figures of speech are broadly divided into two categories: tropes and schemes.

Tropes are figures that alter the fundamental meaning of words. This category includes the core comparative devices this chapter will focus on—metaphor and simile—as well as other figures like irony, hyperbole, and personification. These devices create meaning by asking the reader to understand a word or phrase not by its literal definition, but by its association with another concept.

Schemes, by contrast, are figures that manipulate the ordering and arrangement of words for rhetorical effect. Devices such as anaphora (the repetition of a phrase at the beginning of successive clauses) or chiasmus (a reversal of grammatical structures) fall into this category. While schemes are essential to a poem's rhythm and persuasive power, this chapter will focus primarily on the tropes of comparison that form the imaginative core of poetic language. (Stay tuned next week for Part 3 on Rhythm & Sound!!)

To analyze these comparative figures, it is essential to understand their two core components: the tenor and the vehicle. The tenor is the original subject being described, the thing the poet wants to illuminate. The vehicle is the object or concept being used for the comparison, the lens through which the tenor is viewed. In Robert Burns's famous simile, "O my Luve is like a red, red rose," the "Luve" (love) is the tenor, and the "red, red rose" is the vehicle. The power of the figure lies in the transfer of qualities—beauty, fragrance, passion, perhaps even thorns—from the vehicle to the tenor, creating a richer and more complex understanding of "love" than a literal description could achieve.

2.2 The Metaphoric Leap: Equation, Risk, and Psychological Depth

A metaphor is a direct and assertive comparison between two unlike things, made without using connecting words like "like" or "as".6 It functions as an equation, declaring that one thing is another: "He is a lion on the battlefield". This direct equation is what makes metaphor a "touch riskier" than simile; it "demands a leap of faith on the reader's part" to accept the proposed identity between two dissimilar things. When successful, however, this risk yields a "greater payoff" in terms of imaginative and emotional impact.

The use of metaphor in poetry has ancient roots, with Aristotle in his Poetics identifying it as a key element of poetic language capable of generating new insight. Metaphors can be categorized by their structure and application:

Explicit vs. Implicit Metaphors: An explicit metaphor clearly states the comparison ("He is a lion"), while an implicit metaphor suggests it through imagery and context ("The darkness crept into his soul," implying darkness is an invasive entity).

Extended Metaphors: This type of metaphor is developed over the course of several lines or even an entire poem, creating a rich and immersive conceptual framework.

Mixed Metaphors: These combine two or more incompatible metaphors, which can create a jarring or complex effect. If used unskillfully, they can be confusing, but in the hands of a master, they can represent complex, contradictory states of being.

2.3 Insight: The Evolution of Metaphor from Rhetorical Tool to Psychological Map

The function of metaphor in poetry has evolved significantly over time. In classical and early modern poetry, metaphor often served as a rhetorical tool—a way to clarify an argument, add persuasive force, or display wit. The comparison in "He is a lion" is straightforward; its purpose is to describe the man's bravery in a vivid and economical way. However, in much modern and contemporary poetry, the function of metaphor has shifted from description to enactment. It has become a primary instrument for mapping complex and often fraught psychological states.

This evolution is evident in the way poets like Sylvia Plath deploy metaphor. She does not simply use a metaphor to describe a feeling; she creates a metaphorical landscape in which the feeling becomes an active agent. The metaphor is no longer a static comparison but a dynamic participant in a psychological drama unfolding within the poem. This shift represents a profound change in the device's application, moving it from the realm of rhetoric to the core of psychological exploration.

2.4 Case Study: The Psychological Drama of Sylvia Plath's "Tulips"

Sylvia Plath's poem "Tulips" serves as a masterful case study in the modern psychological metaphor. The poem is set in a hospital room, where the speaker is recovering from a procedure. She craves a state of pure, white, empty peacefulness, a surrender of self: "I am nobody; I have nothing to do with explosions. / I have given my name and my day-clothes up to the nurses". She describes this state as a kind of freedom: "How free it is, you have no idea how free— / The peacefulness is so big it dazes you."

This desired state of numb purity is violently disrupted by the arrival of a bouquet of red tulips. The tulips become the central, extended metaphor for the intrusive, painful, and demanding vitality of life itself. They are not merely flowers; they are an aggressive force. Plath uses a combination of personification and metaphor to give them agency: "The tulips are too excitable, it is winter here." They "breathe / Lightly, through their white swaddlings, like an awful baby," a simile that links them to the responsibilities and attachments the speaker wishes to escape.

The metaphor deepens as the tulips' redness becomes a direct link to the speaker's own physical and emotional pain: "Their redness talks to my wound, it corresponds."They are a physical burden, a "dozen red lead sinkers round my neck," and a source of overwhelming sensory input that "eat my oxygen" and fill the air "like a loud noise." The poem's climax sees the tulips opening "like the mouth of some great African cat," a terrifying image of predatory life. In response, the speaker's own heart "opens and closes / Its bowl of red blooms out of sheer love of me." The metaphor has come full circle: the external force of the tulips has awakened the internal, biological force of her own body, pulling her back from the brink of nothingness into the painful, vibrant world. The poem is a battleground, and metaphor is the weapon, enacting the speaker's profound psychological conflict.

2.5 The Art of the Simile: Illumination and Surprise

A simile is a comparison between two essentially unlike things that explicitly uses a connecting word such as "like," "as," or "than."By using these connectors, a simile implicitly acknowledges that the two items being compared are not identical, but share some illuminating quality. The most effective similes are those that connect ideas or images that are not typically paired, creating originality and surprise that can capture a reader's attention and convey complex emotions in a memorable way.

Billy Collins, in his poem "Books," uses a simile to deepen our understanding of the familiar act of reading: "He moves from paragraph to paragraph / as if touring a house of endless, paneled rooms." This comparison is effective because it is both apt—reading is a form of exploration—and surprising. The vehicle of the "house of endless, paneled rooms" imbues the act of reading with a sense of vastness, architectural complexity, and quiet discovery that a literal description could not achieve.

2.6 Case Study: The Accumulative Power of Simile in Langston Hughes's "Harlem"

Langston Hughes's seminal poem "Harlem" (often known by its first line, "What happens to a dream deferred?") is a masterclass in the accumulative power of the simile. The poem is structured as a series of questions, with each question proposing a different simile for the fate of a "dream deferred"—specifically, the dream of racial equality and social justice for African Americans.

What happens to a dream deferred?

Does it dry up

like a raisin in the sun?

Or fester like a sore—

And then run?

Does it stink like rotten meat?

Or crust and sugar over—

like a syrupy sweet?

Maybe it just sags

like a heavy load.

Or does it explode?

Hughes moves through a devastating sequence of sensory images. The dream first "dries up / like a raisin in the sun," an image of shriveling and lost vitality. Then it becomes a festering wound, an image of infection and decay that appeals to both sight and smell. This is followed by the explicitly olfactory image of meat that "stinks like rotten meat." The next simile, "crust and sugar over— / like a syrupy sweet," suggests a superficial covering that masks the corruption beneath. The penultimate image, "sags / like a heavy load," conveys the dream as a psychological and physical burden.

Each simile adds another layer to Hughes's argument, creating a multi-faceted and increasingly dire portrait of the consequences of social injustice. The series of similes builds a powerful tension that is released in the final, italicized line, which breaks the pattern. The final question—"Or does it explode?"—is not a simile but a stark, violent possibility. The poem's structure, built on a foundation of escalating similes, makes this final question not just a rhetorical flourish but an inevitable and terrifying conclusion.

2.7 Animating the Inanimate: Personification vs. Anthropomorphism

Personification is a literary device that attributes human traits, characteristics, or emotions to non-human subjects, including inanimate objects and abstract concepts. It is a figurative device, not meant to be interpreted literally; when a poet writes "The sun smiled down on us," the intention is to create an image of warmth and benevolence, not to suggest the sun has a literal face.

It is crucial to distinguish personification from the related but distinct device of anthropomorphism. While personification gives human qualities to a non-human subject, anthropomorphism gives non-human subjects human form and behaviors. The character of Mickey Mouse, who walks, talks, and wears clothes, is an example of anthropomorphism. A line like "The dilapidated house frowned at those who passed it by" is an example of personification, as it attributes a human emotion (frowning) to the house to convey its appearance and atmosphere.

Personification is a powerful tool for creating vivid imagery and forging an emotional connection between the reader and the non-human world. In William Wordsworth's "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud," the daffodils are personified as "Fluttering and dancing in the breeze," giving them a joyous, human-like vitality. Perhaps one of the most profound uses of personification in the English canon is Emily Dickinson's "Because I could not stop for Death." In this poem, the abstract concept of Death is personified as a polite and patient gentleman suitor who arrives in a carriage to escort the speaker on her final journey. This act of personification transforms a terrifying and abstract concept into a gentle, civil, and contemplative experience, allowing for a nuanced exploration of mortality and the afterlife.

The art of figurative language is central to the poetic craft, providing the tools for comparison, association, and imaginative transformation. By understanding the foundational distinction between tropes, which alter meaning, and schemes, which alter arrangement, the reader can better appreciate the poet's specific choices. The core comparative tropes of metaphor, simile, and personification are not mere embellishments but the very mechanisms through which poets map complex psychological states, critique social realities, and animate the world with new and surprising vitality. Mastering the analysis of these devices is essential for grasping the full depth and power of any poem.

Next week is Part III: The Poem's Sonic Signature - Sound, Rhythm, and Musicality.

Subscribe now

Write well, write often—

S