The Deadly Face Mask - Programming, MKULTRA (Book Excerpt)
When I see seniors walking about with a mask or wearing a mask in a car, alone, or, certainly, when I see seniors in the gym, wearing masks as they workout, I am both saddened and troubled. And when I see the young wearing masks this is even more concerning, troubling, as their established immunity/recovery rate to a flu ‘virus’, of any kind, is close to 99.8%.
Masks, in fact, worn for only a few minutes can be cultured for pathogenic bacteria and fungi, which accumulate on the mask. As mentioned below, this, in turn, can lead to increased risks of bacterial pneumonia, meningitis, epidural abscesses, and increased levels of CO2 (which goes above the safe level of CO2 for a mask worn for 10 minutes!). Thus masks worn for hours at a time and, certainly, masks worn in a gym environment become truly toxic to the wearers.
What the above represents—continued mask wearing—is, in fact, programming, brainwashing, an MKULTRA technique —a cryptonym assigned to a series of CIA behavior modification and mind control experiments— that were undertaken worldwide during the pandemic. Understand that mask wearing is, without question, a noted and long known MKULTRA technique, to demonstrate submission and to disempower its wearer. For those still wearing the masks, this is what they unknowingly demonstrate.
I have read comparisons in relation to the size of a virus relative to the size of the holes in a mask, as the equivalent of trying to keep a mosquito (virus) out with a chain-link fence (mask). That, however, is quite inaccurate.
Given that a micron or micrometer (mask holes) is 1,000 times larger relative to a nanometer (virus), the appropriate and more accurate comparison is a great deal more, well, dramatic, explanatory (one hopes), and obvious.
The average size of a mosquito is .25 inches or a quarter of an inch, as represented by the Northern House Mosquito. The Northern House Mosquito, in this example, will be playing the role of the 'Covid virus'. Again, given that the holes in the mask are, at least, 1,000 times larger (actually much larger) than the virus, the chain-link fence comparison falls far short.
The appropriate comparison, given the numbers (.25 inches x 1,000), would be 250 inches or, approximately, 20 feet. So the more accurate comparison would be like trying to keep a mosquito out of an open, 20-foot-high door, which would qualify as the door of an airplane hangar. How effective do you think this open airplane-hanger door would be in its attempt to keep out mosquitoes (viruses)? Even the largest mosquito in the world, the Australian elephant mosquito——Toxorhynchites speciosus—at 1.5 inches would have no trouble getting into the airplane hangar via the 20 foot open door, nor would any ‘virus’ through the mask or any mask (N95).
How toxic, specifically, then are the masks that people, young and old, wear to this day? Below from an excerpt of A Derivative ‘Life’: You Are Not Who Or What Or Where You Think You Are are some of the answers.
Begin - Book Excerpt
I needed to include a section on masks as it was imperative to attempt to reach those who continue to wear a mask. A mask which they believe protects them but does not. In fact, wearing a mask can actually cause more damage than not wearing a mask. For instance, mask wearing can lead to—oxygen deprivation, increased CO2 uptake, hypoxia (which impairs brain development and cognition), hypercapnia, epidural abscess, etc. And when worn for even short periods of time—minutes—the masks have been found to serve as an incubator for the production of bacterial and fungal colonies. Masks worn for much longer periods of time can be very dangerous.
Further, masks do not protect you from a ‘virus’ that sees each hole in the fabric of the mask, in relative size, as a large, opened, screen-less window to a gnat. A smoke particle, for instance, can range in size from 2.5 to 10 micrometers (μm). A ‘virus’ particle can range in size from 20 to 750 nanometers (nm). In terms of size the mathematical representation is as follows:
The representation for a micrometer or micron (μm) is: 1 micron = 1/1000 mm
The representation for a nanometer (nm) is: 1 nm = 1/1000 μm
Given the above, the difference between a micrometer and a nanometer is that a nanometer is 1,000 times smaller than a micrometer, which is an order of magnitude. However, seldom, if ever do mask makers and the various public health agencies reference a ‘virus’’ actual size, which is measured in nanometers (20-750 nm) and not micrometers (μm). The reason, of course, is obvious, it would completely invalidate the use of masks for anything other that ‘wet material’—blood, saliva, and other bodily fluids—that would enter a patient’s body, who is undergoing surgery. This is the reason that surgeons wear masks, not to keep out ‘viral’ particles.
I have seen the analogous references to a mask in relation to keeping out the ‘virus’, like a chain-link fence trying to keep out mosquitoes. However, given that the mesh or pores in masks can be seen by eyesight and more easily by a 5 to 10 time magnifying glass and that a 1 nanometer (nm) ‘virus’ requires a transmission electron microscope to view. The appropriate analogy would be like using a chain-link fence to keep out smoke.
Speaking of smoke, I have an experiment for those of you who are still wearing the mask or, even better, the N95 mask and brave enough to undertake this test. Have a friend or family member light a stick of incense or have a friend, who smokes, blow a stream of smoke directly into your mask. It’s an experiment, after all, so this should not be considered offensive. First, you should know that, per the CDC’s own infographic, a molecule of smoke is 10-microns in size, which is at the very least 100 times larger than a virus. If you are able to smell the incense or your friend’s cigarette smoke has easily penetrated your mask, then you should know that your mask is an abject failure at keeping out ‘viral’ particles. Here the logic is fairly straightforward and simple. If a smoke molecule can get through your mask, it would be, at least, 100 times easier for a ‘virus’ molecule to get through that same mask. I do believe that I know the outcome of this experiment—the smoke gets through, regardless of the mask being worn.
There have been a number of studies citing the lack of efficacy of wearing a mask to the potential harm and increased mortality of wearing a mask. Below are studies which speak to the phenomenon.
During ‘COVID-19’ Sweden kept its schools open without mask mandates, social distancing, or testing. There were 1.8 million children in the study from ages 1 to 16. As a result of their policy there were zero deaths from ‘COVID-19’ and neither teachers nor older parents living with the children in the study were affected. There were zero deaths.
The state of Kansas with 105 counties gave each county a choice between whether to accept or to deny mask mandates. Of the 105 counties 81 chose not to accept the mask mandates, while 24 accepted the mask mandates. An observational study—“The Foegen Effect: A Mechanism by Which Face Masks Contribute to the COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate”—was published in Medicine February, 2002. Its author doctor Zacharias Fögen. The study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of wearing the masks in regard to ‘COVID-19’. The study’s finding were that:
“The most important finding from this study is that contrary to the accepted thought that fewer people are dying because infection rates are reduced by masks, this was not the case. Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths or ∼50% more deaths compared to no mask mandates.”
The study also came to the following conclusion:
“This study revealed that wearing a face mask might impose a great risk on individuals, which would not be mitigated by a reduction in the infection rate. The use of face masks might, therefore, be unfit if not contraindicated as an epidemiologic intervention against ‘COVID-19’.”
Certainly the takeaway here is that not only do masks not work with regard to the ‘COVID-19 virus’ or any ‘virus’, but that they are actually more problematic than wearing no mask at all and can actually lead to an increase in mortality.
Another peer reviewed observational study—“Correlation Between Mask Compliance and COVID-19 Outcomes in Europe”—also found a positive correlation between wearing mask and their, harmful effects:
“Moreover, the moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe also suggests that the universal use of masks may have had harmful unintended consequences”.
Other consequences of wearing a mask are that, within minutes, pathogenic bacteria and fungi accumulate on the mask and can be cultured. This, in turn, can lead to increased risks of bacterial pneumonia, meningitis, epidural abscesses, and increased levels of CO2 (which goes above the safe level of CO2 for a mask worn for 10 minutes). As earlier pointed out, this can lead to hypoxia and hypercapnia. It should be noted that hypoxia impairs brain development and cognition in children.
That children have been mandated to wear masks either reflects tremendous incompetence or it is child abuse and endangerment and is beyond evil.
For those still wearing masks in the belief that a mask can keep them safe from a ‘virus’ that must be seen through an electron microscope, you have been lied to and exploited. These masks have not helped you, they have, in fact, potentially harmed you. Taking them off for good is not just a symbolic gesture, though it is indeed that, but it may well save your life. Additionally, you demonstrate that you will no longer be a slave. Taking off the mask will also help you to heal physically, psychologically, and emotionally.
End- Book Excerpt
Why will most continue to wear the mask? Because they have been programmed, brainwashed and nothing short of de-programming will help them to understand. The worldwide MKULTRA event, known as ‘COVID-19’, has made those who continue to wear the mask its victims. Let us believe, it is not a permanent situation.
End
Masks, in fact, worn for only a few minutes can be cultured for pathogenic bacteria and fungi, which accumulate on the mask. As mentioned below, this, in turn, can lead to increased risks of bacterial pneumonia, meningitis, epidural abscesses, and increased levels of CO2 (which goes above the safe level of CO2 for a mask worn for 10 minutes!). Thus masks worn for hours at a time and, certainly, masks worn in a gym environment become truly toxic to the wearers.
What the above represents—continued mask wearing—is, in fact, programming, brainwashing, an MKULTRA technique —a cryptonym assigned to a series of CIA behavior modification and mind control experiments— that were undertaken worldwide during the pandemic. Understand that mask wearing is, without question, a noted and long known MKULTRA technique, to demonstrate submission and to disempower its wearer. For those still wearing the masks, this is what they unknowingly demonstrate.
I have read comparisons in relation to the size of a virus relative to the size of the holes in a mask, as the equivalent of trying to keep a mosquito (virus) out with a chain-link fence (mask). That, however, is quite inaccurate.
Given that a micron or micrometer (mask holes) is 1,000 times larger relative to a nanometer (virus), the appropriate and more accurate comparison is a great deal more, well, dramatic, explanatory (one hopes), and obvious.
The average size of a mosquito is .25 inches or a quarter of an inch, as represented by the Northern House Mosquito. The Northern House Mosquito, in this example, will be playing the role of the 'Covid virus'. Again, given that the holes in the mask are, at least, 1,000 times larger (actually much larger) than the virus, the chain-link fence comparison falls far short.
The appropriate comparison, given the numbers (.25 inches x 1,000), would be 250 inches or, approximately, 20 feet. So the more accurate comparison would be like trying to keep a mosquito out of an open, 20-foot-high door, which would qualify as the door of an airplane hangar. How effective do you think this open airplane-hanger door would be in its attempt to keep out mosquitoes (viruses)? Even the largest mosquito in the world, the Australian elephant mosquito——Toxorhynchites speciosus—at 1.5 inches would have no trouble getting into the airplane hangar via the 20 foot open door, nor would any ‘virus’ through the mask or any mask (N95).
How toxic, specifically, then are the masks that people, young and old, wear to this day? Below from an excerpt of A Derivative ‘Life’: You Are Not Who Or What Or Where You Think You Are are some of the answers.
Begin - Book Excerpt
I needed to include a section on masks as it was imperative to attempt to reach those who continue to wear a mask. A mask which they believe protects them but does not. In fact, wearing a mask can actually cause more damage than not wearing a mask. For instance, mask wearing can lead to—oxygen deprivation, increased CO2 uptake, hypoxia (which impairs brain development and cognition), hypercapnia, epidural abscess, etc. And when worn for even short periods of time—minutes—the masks have been found to serve as an incubator for the production of bacterial and fungal colonies. Masks worn for much longer periods of time can be very dangerous.
Further, masks do not protect you from a ‘virus’ that sees each hole in the fabric of the mask, in relative size, as a large, opened, screen-less window to a gnat. A smoke particle, for instance, can range in size from 2.5 to 10 micrometers (μm). A ‘virus’ particle can range in size from 20 to 750 nanometers (nm). In terms of size the mathematical representation is as follows:
The representation for a micrometer or micron (μm) is: 1 micron = 1/1000 mm
The representation for a nanometer (nm) is: 1 nm = 1/1000 μm
Given the above, the difference between a micrometer and a nanometer is that a nanometer is 1,000 times smaller than a micrometer, which is an order of magnitude. However, seldom, if ever do mask makers and the various public health agencies reference a ‘virus’’ actual size, which is measured in nanometers (20-750 nm) and not micrometers (μm). The reason, of course, is obvious, it would completely invalidate the use of masks for anything other that ‘wet material’—blood, saliva, and other bodily fluids—that would enter a patient’s body, who is undergoing surgery. This is the reason that surgeons wear masks, not to keep out ‘viral’ particles.
I have seen the analogous references to a mask in relation to keeping out the ‘virus’, like a chain-link fence trying to keep out mosquitoes. However, given that the mesh or pores in masks can be seen by eyesight and more easily by a 5 to 10 time magnifying glass and that a 1 nanometer (nm) ‘virus’ requires a transmission electron microscope to view. The appropriate analogy would be like using a chain-link fence to keep out smoke.
Speaking of smoke, I have an experiment for those of you who are still wearing the mask or, even better, the N95 mask and brave enough to undertake this test. Have a friend or family member light a stick of incense or have a friend, who smokes, blow a stream of smoke directly into your mask. It’s an experiment, after all, so this should not be considered offensive. First, you should know that, per the CDC’s own infographic, a molecule of smoke is 10-microns in size, which is at the very least 100 times larger than a virus. If you are able to smell the incense or your friend’s cigarette smoke has easily penetrated your mask, then you should know that your mask is an abject failure at keeping out ‘viral’ particles. Here the logic is fairly straightforward and simple. If a smoke molecule can get through your mask, it would be, at least, 100 times easier for a ‘virus’ molecule to get through that same mask. I do believe that I know the outcome of this experiment—the smoke gets through, regardless of the mask being worn.
There have been a number of studies citing the lack of efficacy of wearing a mask to the potential harm and increased mortality of wearing a mask. Below are studies which speak to the phenomenon.
During ‘COVID-19’ Sweden kept its schools open without mask mandates, social distancing, or testing. There were 1.8 million children in the study from ages 1 to 16. As a result of their policy there were zero deaths from ‘COVID-19’ and neither teachers nor older parents living with the children in the study were affected. There were zero deaths.
The state of Kansas with 105 counties gave each county a choice between whether to accept or to deny mask mandates. Of the 105 counties 81 chose not to accept the mask mandates, while 24 accepted the mask mandates. An observational study—“The Foegen Effect: A Mechanism by Which Face Masks Contribute to the COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate”—was published in Medicine February, 2002. Its author doctor Zacharias Fögen. The study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of wearing the masks in regard to ‘COVID-19’. The study’s finding were that:
“The most important finding from this study is that contrary to the accepted thought that fewer people are dying because infection rates are reduced by masks, this was not the case. Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths or ∼50% more deaths compared to no mask mandates.”
The study also came to the following conclusion:
“This study revealed that wearing a face mask might impose a great risk on individuals, which would not be mitigated by a reduction in the infection rate. The use of face masks might, therefore, be unfit if not contraindicated as an epidemiologic intervention against ‘COVID-19’.”
Certainly the takeaway here is that not only do masks not work with regard to the ‘COVID-19 virus’ or any ‘virus’, but that they are actually more problematic than wearing no mask at all and can actually lead to an increase in mortality.
Another peer reviewed observational study—“Correlation Between Mask Compliance and COVID-19 Outcomes in Europe”—also found a positive correlation between wearing mask and their, harmful effects:
“Moreover, the moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe also suggests that the universal use of masks may have had harmful unintended consequences”.
Other consequences of wearing a mask are that, within minutes, pathogenic bacteria and fungi accumulate on the mask and can be cultured. This, in turn, can lead to increased risks of bacterial pneumonia, meningitis, epidural abscesses, and increased levels of CO2 (which goes above the safe level of CO2 for a mask worn for 10 minutes). As earlier pointed out, this can lead to hypoxia and hypercapnia. It should be noted that hypoxia impairs brain development and cognition in children.
That children have been mandated to wear masks either reflects tremendous incompetence or it is child abuse and endangerment and is beyond evil.
For those still wearing masks in the belief that a mask can keep them safe from a ‘virus’ that must be seen through an electron microscope, you have been lied to and exploited. These masks have not helped you, they have, in fact, potentially harmed you. Taking them off for good is not just a symbolic gesture, though it is indeed that, but it may well save your life. Additionally, you demonstrate that you will no longer be a slave. Taking off the mask will also help you to heal physically, psychologically, and emotionally.
End- Book Excerpt
Why will most continue to wear the mask? Because they have been programmed, brainwashed and nothing short of de-programming will help them to understand. The worldwide MKULTRA event, known as ‘COVID-19’, has made those who continue to wear the mask its victims. Let us believe, it is not a permanent situation.
End
No comments have been added yet.
