No Describing How Evil Masking Was
I had planned to spend the bulk of today removing fiberglass insulation from the attic, but I couldn’t find my N95 respirator. Not wanting to run out to the store to buy a new one, I decided to don an old birdemic cloth mask I happened to stumble upon in my workshed.
The N95 respirator is marketed as effective for filtering out particles when working with fiberglass; however, my past experiences with it revealed it to be only partly effective. The mask gets soggy after an hour or two, and the dust and particles eventually find a way to penetrate. Having experienced this, I knew the cloth mask would be far less effective. Still, I figured it was better than nothing.
Well, I was coughing and wheezing within five minutes, and I only lasted about an hour in the unventilated attic. When I took the cloth mask off, I noticed black and brown smudges on the interior. It was worse than completely useless. It effectively trapped dust and fiberglass particles within the mask, yet during the birdemic, it was touted as a safe and effective way to stop the dreaded birdemic virus. I chuckled after I came down from the attic.
Don’t get me wrong. I never believed any of the masking claims during the birdemic; however, reexperiencing how patently absurd and utterly ineffective masking is reminded me of just how unfathomably evil those in power were (and still are).
Anyway, just in case anyone still cares, System apparatchiks are still doing their darndest to convince us that masking during the birdemic was effective, safe, and scientifically sound (edited slightly and bold added):
A comprehensive new review published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews provides strong evidence that masks and respirators are effective in reducing the transmission of respiratory infections like BIRDEMIC-19. The review, conducted by an international team of 13 researchers, analysed over 400 studies from multiple disciplines, including epidemiology, public health, engineering, and social sciences.
'Our review confirms that masks work, with a clear dose-response effect,' said lead author Professor Trisha Greenhalgh from the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford. 'The more consistently and correctly you wear a mask, the better protected you are. Respirators, when worn continuously, provide even greater protection than ordinary masks.'
Masks, including cloth face coverings and disposable medical masks, help reduce the spread of respiratory droplets and aerosols. Respirators, such as N95 and FFP2 devices, are designed to filter out smaller airborne particles and fit more tightly to the face, providing a higher level of protection.
Cool.
All I can say is that it’s a good thing the birdemic virus isn’t made of fiberglass or dust.
The N95 respirator is marketed as effective for filtering out particles when working with fiberglass; however, my past experiences with it revealed it to be only partly effective. The mask gets soggy after an hour or two, and the dust and particles eventually find a way to penetrate. Having experienced this, I knew the cloth mask would be far less effective. Still, I figured it was better than nothing.
Well, I was coughing and wheezing within five minutes, and I only lasted about an hour in the unventilated attic. When I took the cloth mask off, I noticed black and brown smudges on the interior. It was worse than completely useless. It effectively trapped dust and fiberglass particles within the mask, yet during the birdemic, it was touted as a safe and effective way to stop the dreaded birdemic virus. I chuckled after I came down from the attic.
Don’t get me wrong. I never believed any of the masking claims during the birdemic; however, reexperiencing how patently absurd and utterly ineffective masking is reminded me of just how unfathomably evil those in power were (and still are).
Anyway, just in case anyone still cares, System apparatchiks are still doing their darndest to convince us that masking during the birdemic was effective, safe, and scientifically sound (edited slightly and bold added):
A comprehensive new review published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews provides strong evidence that masks and respirators are effective in reducing the transmission of respiratory infections like BIRDEMIC-19. The review, conducted by an international team of 13 researchers, analysed over 400 studies from multiple disciplines, including epidemiology, public health, engineering, and social sciences.
'Our review confirms that masks work, with a clear dose-response effect,' said lead author Professor Trisha Greenhalgh from the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford. 'The more consistently and correctly you wear a mask, the better protected you are. Respirators, when worn continuously, provide even greater protection than ordinary masks.'
Masks, including cloth face coverings and disposable medical masks, help reduce the spread of respiratory droplets and aerosols. Respirators, such as N95 and FFP2 devices, are designed to filter out smaller airborne particles and fit more tightly to the face, providing a higher level of protection.
Cool.
All I can say is that it’s a good thing the birdemic virus isn’t made of fiberglass or dust.
No comments have been added yet.
