The Offing of What’s On

For the final seven decades of the last millennium, most people in the developed world scheduled their evenings by answering a simple question: What’s on? For the first two of those decades, the question was “What’s on the radio?” For the next five, it was “What’s on TV?”
Guidance toward answers were provided on newspaper pages covering entertainment, and in weekly magazines. The biggest of those was TV Giude, at its peak the most popular magazine in the U.S. *with 20 million customers, plus some multiple of pass-along readers.
In the guide were stations (such as those above), which belonged to networks. The biggest of those—CBS, NBC, and ABC—migrated over from radio. PBS and Fox came later.
To get TV stations, you needed an antenna. Rabbit ears worked if you had strong signals, but the picture looked best only if you had a roof antenna. The best of those looked like the skeleton of a 10-foot tuna on a spike:

In rural areas, you needed a big one, ideally high above the ground, on a tower of its own or strapped to a chimney, with a rotator so you could spin it around. The one I used in Chapel Hill, back in the ’70s and early ’80s, could get every station within two hundred miles. I got channel 7s from Washington, NC, and Roanoke, VA. On channel 3, I got Charlotte and Wilmington, both in NC.
Cable began as CATV—Community Antenna Television. When I lived in far northern New Jersey in the early ’70s, we were shadowed by terrain from New York City and Philadelphia signals, but our CATV provider gave us the 12 VHF channels of both cities. Gradually, cable companies added lots of channels that were cable-only. That gave folks a lot more answers to “What’s On?” and kept that era going.
But that era is mostly over, because optionality vergest on absolute. This happened because, as Clay Shirky put it,

Interesting fact: What makes a TV a TV is its antenna connection:
Without that and the tuner inside, it’s just a monitor.
So let’s compare:
And that bottom line is where we’re at. “What’s on?” has become an archaic expression, like “prithee” and “forsooth.”
And we’re changed by that. As Marshall McLuhan is said to have said (yes, he meant it, but didn’t say it—see that last link), we shape our tools, and then our tools shape us.
So, what’s our shape now? Are we becoming phono sapiens?
I think it’s more like… where are we now?
Clearly, we are in a state of massive optionality, but the mass itself is not optimized, and won’t be until we get much better control over our lives, and our personal data, than we have now.
For that we need personal AI. We don’t have it yet. Not the collective we, including all the Muggles.
The wizards are having fun with MCP, for example. Just learned oday about BrowserMCP. I’m eager to get going on KwaaiNet.
Anyway, it’s important to note in passing that What’s On is mostly Off.
Doc Searls's Blog
- Doc Searls's profile
- 11 followers
