date
newest »
newest »
GGK's stuff is an acquired taste, for sure. Character and setting-wise: Jared Diamond PH D in The World Until Yesterday: What Can We Learn from Traditional Societies? points out that most people who live in subsistence economies (I mean, we all do ultimately, but in urban societies we don't have to catch or grow our own food) don't view killing an 'enemy' who comes raiding as a bad thing - you saved your family and clan's resources and therefore potentially saved them from starvation: you're a hero! Guilt and PTSD don't come into it. Ditto, I would guess, any European serf or knight from the Middle Ages. Even the most pious* would kill to stop someone stealing the family pig... The flipside is that 50%+ of deaths among males were due to violence, and men were too scared to go outside the village perimeter to answer the call of nature in case an enemy was lurking, but hey: women had childbirth. So, yes, scope for some different takes on attitudes, but the characters still have to resonate with readers - not always an easy line to walk.*In the Albigensian Crusades against the Cathars in Southern France, one knight was concerned about killing non-Cathars as well as Cathars during the massacre of an entire town's population: how would you tell Believer from Heretic? "Kill them all," the Priest replied. "God will know the difference."



Even in a European-inspired setting, what you said about characters from your local coffee shop - I hate that. You don't have to go back very far (which means you don't need to go into the future very far) for people to have completely different ways of living, which shapes attitudes, values, pictures of how the universe works, 'the past is a foreign country' and all that.
I'm just finishing Guy Gavriel Kay's fantasy trilogy (Fionavar),, and I loathe it for many reasons, not least that the central characters are four intensely bland University of Toronto students, just beige incarnate.