Lately I've been wondering if freedom is a zero sum game. In other words, for one person to get more freedom, someone else has to lose the same amount, but usually in a different way.
I predict that you just reflexively rejected that concept, but your stubborness won't stop me from unfolding the idea a bit more. To that end, only examples can help.
Example one: In order for me to be free to walk down the sidewalk, other people must be prohibited from driving on them.
You could argue that I'm st...
Published on December 14, 2009 10:11