Arguments for “Historical Accuracy” That Are All Smoke and Mirrors.

In my next post I will be staking out the “negative” side on the debate I had with myself in class, arguing against the resolution, Resolved: The Book of Acts is Historically Reliable.  I have already made the affirmative case; in the negative I will argue that the book is not reliable (that first speech [...]

The post Arguments for “Historical Accuracy” That Are All Smoke and Mirrors. appeared first on The Bart Ehrman Blog.