Is the Big Bang Really the Beginning?
ππ πππ πππ ππππ ππππππ πππ πππππππππ?
ππππππππππ: This is a discussion topic, not a statement (before I am burnt at the stake π)
In my βHumanityβs Dawnβ universe I decided to go with the concept of what Iβve come to term as the βCradleβ. Ultimately, our universe is one of many thousands, that sits on a sphere like ball of energy, and was born from a surface eruption (the big bang). In the book the discovery of this is effectively played out as a sort of inverse βflat eartherβ revelation to humanity, their concept of the cosmos has been all wrong!
The physics within the sphere are the opposite of those in our universe, with matter being the expelled element from with the Cradle. I particularly enjoyed playing with the subjects of dark matter and energy. From the information that I have read to date I donβt like how they have been fudge factored into our understanding of the universe to explain something we donβt yet fully understand. I play with this, attributing the repelling and attracting forces to the internal processes of the Cradle going on beneath the conceivable quantum boundary of our very 3 dimensional existence.
I have attached some of the illustrations (Fig. 3-6) I use in my first book, utilising a bit of mathematical trickery to add a bit of plausibility! The best argument so far for dark energy is that the expansion of the universe is increasing in speed. I flip this idea on its head and show a comparison of how an explosion of this magnitude (birth from the cradle), would actually speed up if it was rolling over a curved surface (cradle concept), rather than a flat surface (our current understanding of the universe).
Iβve always been fascinated at how many systems take the most efficient structure, a sphere for example, when they are often born out of such chaos and ever increasing entropy; nature is truly remarkable.
Could it be that our universe is the byproduct of a volcanic type eruption on a cosmological scale?
ππππππππππ: This is a discussion topic, not a statement (before I am burnt at the stake π)
In my βHumanityβs Dawnβ universe I decided to go with the concept of what Iβve come to term as the βCradleβ. Ultimately, our universe is one of many thousands, that sits on a sphere like ball of energy, and was born from a surface eruption (the big bang). In the book the discovery of this is effectively played out as a sort of inverse βflat eartherβ revelation to humanity, their concept of the cosmos has been all wrong!
The physics within the sphere are the opposite of those in our universe, with matter being the expelled element from with the Cradle. I particularly enjoyed playing with the subjects of dark matter and energy. From the information that I have read to date I donβt like how they have been fudge factored into our understanding of the universe to explain something we donβt yet fully understand. I play with this, attributing the repelling and attracting forces to the internal processes of the Cradle going on beneath the conceivable quantum boundary of our very 3 dimensional existence.
I have attached some of the illustrations (Fig. 3-6) I use in my first book, utilising a bit of mathematical trickery to add a bit of plausibility! The best argument so far for dark energy is that the expansion of the universe is increasing in speed. I flip this idea on its head and show a comparison of how an explosion of this magnitude (birth from the cradle), would actually speed up if it was rolling over a curved surface (cradle concept), rather than a flat surface (our current understanding of the universe).
Iβve always been fascinated at how many systems take the most efficient structure, a sphere for example, when they are often born out of such chaos and ever increasing entropy; nature is truly remarkable.
Could it be that our universe is the byproduct of a volcanic type eruption on a cosmological scale?
No comments have been added yet.
