Classics that are worth reading

Ooh! Ooh! The Count of Monte Cristo ">The Count of Monte Cristo.

My goodness, the kindle version is just $0.99. It’s unabridged. I actually especially favor the abridged version I first read, but you know what, fine. For that price, I’m picking up this ebook version.

What else?

Pride and Prejudice, which, is this a trend? is also available in a kindle ebook for $0.99. Well, in this case, I have lovely paper copies, so even though I prefer ebooks, I’ll stick with those. Also the rest of Jane Austen’s books … wow, this ebook collects all of Jane Austen’s works and it’s free? Okay, never mind. I still love my nice paper editions, but I mean.

What’s another great classic? Little Women. Not quite free, but certainly inexpensive. I haven’t read this for years, and I always pushed back a bit against certain elements, but nevertheless.

What else? Well, let’s pause to link to the post that caught my eye, which is at Book Riot: The Best Classic Books (That Are Actually Worth a Read)

I do not expect to agree with many of Book Riot’s picks because I usually don’t. I’m curious what they’re going to pick, and beyond that, I’m curious about their definition. Does a book have to be over 100 years old and still widely read in order to qualify? Does it have to be assigned in a lot of high school classes? What are the criteria? …. Doesn’t look like any criteria are stated? Well, that seems a little odd.

Well, some of these are things anybody would agree are classics, I expect. The author of the post seems to be treating this as “we all know what we mean by classics,” and I guess there are worse definitions. I’ve never heard of plenty, and some I hated, but here’s The Scarlet Pimpernel! I do like that one. I’m surprised to see it here.

A few of these were published as late as the 1980s. Nothing published in the eighties can be a classic, surely? I feel old.

Most interesting entry: The Ramayana. It turns out there are a zillion editions. The abridged this, the modernized that. I picked this edition because it’s the same one as at the Book Riot post, and I’m just trusting that person to have a reason to select this edition. Unlike everything else here, it’s not super inexpensive. but you know what, I’ve always kind of wanted to at least look at it. Maybe I’ll get a sample and see how it goes.

Entry where I recoiled: Like Water for Chocolate. I read it long ago and loathed some parts of it so much that this reaction colored the whole thing. No, I don’t remember what I hated about it. But I guess I’ll never know, because I remember the reaction well enough that I will never reread it.

Quick! One great classic that you would sincerely push on people who have missed it. Anything?

Please Feel Free to Share: Facebook twitter reddit pinterest linkedin tumblr mail

The post Classics that are worth reading appeared first on Rachel Neumeier.

3 likes ·   •  23 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 06, 2023 22:53
Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Michelle (new)

Michelle I love The Count of Monte Cristo! It's on my re-read rotation.


message 2: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier It's my most-read classic by a mile. I wish there were a movie version I actually liked, but nope. But I will love the book forever.


message 3: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Rachel wrote: "I wish there were a movie version I actually liked, but nope."

Not even Reynolds' The Count of Monte Cristo?
But I really like Jim Caviezel, so I'm biased.


message 4: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Michelle wrote: "I love The Count of Monte Cristo! It's on my re-read rotation."

I read it as a little boy. It took me eight or nine months. I used to stop reading every two pages, it was too hard. I've never gone through it again, but I'd like to.


message 5: by Oldman_JE (new)

Oldman_JE Michael wrote: "Rachel wrote: "I wish there were a movie version I actually liked, but nope."

Not even Reynolds' The Count of Monte Cristo?
But I really like Jim Caviezel, so I'm biased."


Wasn't aware there was more than one. Will be looking into this.

I suggest you try again, Michael.


message 6: by Oldman_JE (new)

Oldman_JE Rachel, my one classic would be The SeaWolf. I read it not long ago, so all the others aren't fresh in my mind. But this one, wow. It seems that White Fang and Call of the Wild are the two go-to's and SeaWolf is, actually, not about a canine.


message 7: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier Michael, basically, nope. I like some moments in each movie version, but here is how I believe a movie version ought to go: The entire prison section, the whole Chateau d'If, goes into a montage in the opening credits. Anything absolutely, utterly crucial that happened before or during the Chateau d'If goes in a very brief flashback wherever it has to be put. Then the actual movie begins when the Count steps onto stage, and from then on, the plot closely follows the book, with judicious cutting of bandits and so forth in order to fit into a movie.


message 8: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier Oldman_JE wrote: "Rachel, my one classic would be The SeaWolf..."

I liked The Sea-wolf, but not nearly as much as White Fang.


message 9: by Michelle (new)

Michelle I just re-read Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest since we're on an Oldie but Goodie theme!


message 10: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Oldman_JE wrote: "I suggest you try again, Michael."

I'll try it again, Oldman :-)


message 11: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Rachel wrote: "Michael, basically, nope. I like some moments in each movie version, but here is how I believe a movie version ought to go: The entire prison section, the whole Chateau d'If, goes into a montage in..."

Okay, you really love this novel! ;-)


message 12: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan My classic could be Wise Blood.


message 13: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier Flannery O'Conner is a fantastic writer, but I admit I've never even looked at that one -- yet.


message 14: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier Michael wrote: "Rachel wrote: "Michael, basically, nope. I like some moments in each movie version, but here is how I believe a movie version ought to go: The entire prison section, the whole Chateau d'If, goes in..."

Yep! I've practically written the screenplay that I want to see!


message 15: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Rachel wrote: "Flannery O'Conner is a fantastic writer, but I admit I've never even looked at that one -- yet."

Try it. I think Hazel Motes, the main c., is really painted to perfection. But so are the minor ones. I remember it with incredible vividness.


message 16: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Neumeier She's a very visual writer. I should write a post about that, about drawing the scene, authors who do that especially well.


message 17: by Oldman_JE (new)

Oldman_JE Rachel wrote: "She's a very visual writer. I should write a post about that, about drawing the scene, authors who do that especially well."

I'll read it. Walter Mosley, I've found, is exceptional at doing so.


message 18: by Oldman_JE (new)

Oldman_JE Michael wrote: "My classic could be Wise Blood."

Added to my mountain.


message 19: by Michelle (new)

Michelle Michael, I can see why you'd be bored with The Count of Monte Cristo when you were a kid. I read it relatively late in life after watching the film version with Jim Caviezel (another fan here 👋). The dialogue is excellent, but I should think that it's more to the taste of an adult. I'll bet that I'm in the minority among the four of us, but I really loved Wuthering Heights, too. What a dysfunctional relationship they had!


message 20: by Oldman_JE (new)

Oldman_JE Rachel wrote: "Michael, basically, nope. I like some moments in each movie version, but here is how I believe a movie version ought to go: The entire prison section, the whole Chateau d'If, goes into a montage in..."

Expected release late 2024 of a new Count of Monte Cristo! Maybe this one will meet your expectations.


message 21: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Michelle wrote: " I'll bet that I'm in the minority among the four of us, but I really loved Wuthering Heights, too. What a dysfunctional relationship they had!..."

Never read Wuthering Heights, I generally avoid overly romantic stories, but I'll give it a try. And I will reread Count of Monte Cristo, now that's my challenge :-)


message 22: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Oldman_JE wrote: "Michael wrote: "My classic could be Wise Blood."

Added to my mountain."


I'm sure you'll enjoy it!


message 23: by Michael (new)

Michael B. Morgan Oldman_JE wrote: "Expected release late 2024 of a new Count of Monte Cristo!..."

Uh, the cast doesn't blow me away, I admit. But who knows...


back to top