date
newest »


Thank you very much for this explanation.
Certainly I would like to ask you about Diane Stein's book "Essential Reiki". How did it have such an effect on the integrity of the profession?

I have encountered well-meaning people who were so affected by the glamorisation of "healing", that they strongly considered leaving their established careers - careers where they were useful, contributing members of society - to study some type of energy medicine which was a wild divergence from their hard-won skills and aptitudes.
In talking with them, I got the impression they were worried they weren't "really" doing helpful, meaningful work unless they were doing "healing".

Working with energy *does not* constitute any kind of elevation above normal human importance (I once had someone thunder angrily at me, that they believed they were allowed to say racist things because they could feel energies.)

Do we all have an innate capability to fix cars? Or are these skillsets that need to be correctly taught, so that we could do a proper job with them - one that does not cause more problems than it solves?

We aren't "all healers" and thankfully, there is absolutely no need for us to be.

I particularly appreciate how you describe the deep and growing skill you have as an acupuncturist.
This is such an honorable way of doing a profession.

Even if well intentioned, if you are mucking about with no skills and holding yourself out as a professional, that is not fair to those who might end up your clients.
I'm commenting on some current info at this blogpost by Rose. None of this shows up in the version at Goodreads, but currently there are 542 comments.
To find the context for my comments, just search on: "Rose Rosetree’s Books on Goodreads, Author Q&A" (Include the quotes in your search.)
The relevant comments are at Rose's blog as Comments #449-495. I'm adding my thoughts about that here.