Total Creation.

It is true that for a long time I have considered the question of creation. To be more specific, the universe and life. At first sight there is the cosmological position that an agent of some sort is necessary to start things off. This theory can be challenged in several ways. Starting with the idea of an agent presumes that an agent exists that has the qualities necessary. Therefore I prefer to use x for self motivated action and that does not require any intention or goal. That would not automatically qualify as a God but does the job.

Then X could be inherent in the start of the universe, as existence is self selecting that either the universe has the qualities to survive or not.

How can the truth of creation be found? I decided that looking at the process involved in life would ultimately indicate if there is intention or evolution that can indicate the variety of life. The point is that there does not appear to be any specific form of life that has not evolved from earlier life. That evolution has in many ways taken millions of years. Life in order to survive arguably adapts to its environment and over time and isolation, a new strain of life could come into being.

Intentional creation is specific and stops once created, as a finished article. Everywhere you look on Earth there are objects that have been created by an agent and can be recognised as a finished piece of work.

It would be a mistake to view everything that can be seen now as the same as it was at the beginning of time. A little bit of research can show how the universe and life are changing without a specific goal. That to me, suggests the initial creation of the universe has no specific intention and also that life is a product without a specific conclusion. Therefore its survival depends on unspecific actions.

It is quite clear to me that there are two forms of total creation and to ignore one in favour of the other could give a false understanding or a different and altogether less comprehensive perspective.