date
newest »

message 1:
by
Chris
(new)
Sep 03, 2023 06:16AM

reply
|
flag



Social media makes everyone so fucking dumb.



At leaat here we can diacuss. On his page he closed all discussion on almost all posts

Ironic, given the words in his post here, huh? Amazing writer, but flaming hypocrite.

Otherwise we must say every printed book is censorship, since we cannot engage on the spot with its author.

Otherwise we must..."
Printed books are very dofferent from online blog

Two very different things. One is a physical impossibility, the other is a choice made to present a viewpoint but accept no response.


Keep in mind that these book bans are applying to high school libraries as well as middle school. If you don’t want your kids reading whatever you deem inappropriate then maybe you should consider paying attention to what they read.

Are all YA books removed? Is one person's comment enough for it. Someone posted on FB a library cabinet of "banned" books and it inclided Hobbit. What's going on in US? Asking as a foreigner.


The issue is that they are labeling basically innocent books as containing "inappropriate content". "Speak", "The Hobbit", "Magnus Chase trilogy". Then they are completely banning these books from school libraries which is keeping kids in middle and high school from reading them also.
When I was in middle school I had to get a friend to drive me to the local public library (which these same people are trying to cut funding from) just so I could check out "The Golden Compass" and the "Harry Potter" books.

Who are "they" and how can they ban Hobbit? What is their explanation and who are those accepting it?

I recant my statement about "The Hobbit" apparently it was only banned in my school (I went to a Catholic school in FL) and publicly burned by a church in New Mexico.
The main people pushing for book bans are Republican lawmakers. Generally, they're banning books that have LGBTQ+ content or ideas they generally disagree with.

If those books are banned from children's access - good. "Ideas they disagree with" - should depend on the idea. E.g I doubt they'd manage to get Obamas' or Clintons' (auto)biographies "banned"

So banning books where the only "inappropriate content" is that one character has feelings for someone of the same sex as them is ok? Because they're banning books with even slight mentions of LGBTQ+ people.
And by books with ideas they disagree with I'm talking about books with any mentions of systematic racism (The Hate U Give is a good example).