End of Monarchy.
The most despicable occasion took place recently in the United Kingdom with the parading and fawning of people for the notorious adulterers Charles and Camilla. The so-called king Charles, the third by birth, claimed the entitlement to a crowning ceremony that cost his subjects over Two Hundred and Fifty Million Pounds, at a time when his subjects are under dire financial pressure and the NHS is on its knees. His disregard for their financial position should perhaps not be too surprising, when you consider the empathy shown for his first wife, widely known as the Queen of hearts, Diana.
Charles openly flaunted his activities with his mistress of that time, the arrogant Camilla. Someone who, it is well documented, took pleasure in taunting Princess Diana. I believe without doubt, the reports of the sustained attempts by Charles and Camila to diminish Diana’s mental health and this was an aim to push her over the edge.
The mother of Charles' two sons did not in my view deserve the treatment given out by the conniving pair. Having the sons take part in the, for me, questionable marriage reaches the height of betrayal.
Camilla Parker Bowles’s first husband was a Catholic and their children were brought up Catholic. Apart from stealing other people's husbands, using and manipulating, one might legitimately ask what faith does Camila believe in?
King Charles the Second had a mistress as well, in fact several of them, but he did not marry them, then claim that they are royalty and deserve the title of Queen.
When I give my commitment to Royalty, it is to something deserving that honour.
Charles the Third as a person has been on numerous occasions shown to be a hypocrite, he may have done one or two good things but they are in my opinion, outweighed by his lack of humanity for his fellow beings.
I object to even the government’s lack of fiscal control, easily allowing for a lavish Coronation and dragging out lengthy negotiations to pay for much needed NHS and society required workers. Where is the integrity in a PM who has sworn in as a protector for our country, who does not choose to comply with the needs of the people over the desires of a single unworthy person.
I sincerely believe the sooner the Monarchy is brought to an end, the more just and fair things will become. The United Kingdom should emphasise the united aspect that it has most usually in abundance and not become divided by the very person put there to achieve the opposite. I am not alone in this theory, with more countries choosing not to have a Monarch as the Head of State. It is an antiquated regime and one that seems to dictate unequal treatment. I was not so strong in my conviction until Charles III proved that his desire for self and grandeur outweighs that of the good for the people.
Charles openly flaunted his activities with his mistress of that time, the arrogant Camilla. Someone who, it is well documented, took pleasure in taunting Princess Diana. I believe without doubt, the reports of the sustained attempts by Charles and Camila to diminish Diana’s mental health and this was an aim to push her over the edge.
The mother of Charles' two sons did not in my view deserve the treatment given out by the conniving pair. Having the sons take part in the, for me, questionable marriage reaches the height of betrayal.
Camilla Parker Bowles’s first husband was a Catholic and their children were brought up Catholic. Apart from stealing other people's husbands, using and manipulating, one might legitimately ask what faith does Camila believe in?
King Charles the Second had a mistress as well, in fact several of them, but he did not marry them, then claim that they are royalty and deserve the title of Queen.
When I give my commitment to Royalty, it is to something deserving that honour.
Charles the Third as a person has been on numerous occasions shown to be a hypocrite, he may have done one or two good things but they are in my opinion, outweighed by his lack of humanity for his fellow beings.
I object to even the government’s lack of fiscal control, easily allowing for a lavish Coronation and dragging out lengthy negotiations to pay for much needed NHS and society required workers. Where is the integrity in a PM who has sworn in as a protector for our country, who does not choose to comply with the needs of the people over the desires of a single unworthy person.
I sincerely believe the sooner the Monarchy is brought to an end, the more just and fair things will become. The United Kingdom should emphasise the united aspect that it has most usually in abundance and not become divided by the very person put there to achieve the opposite. I am not alone in this theory, with more countries choosing not to have a Monarch as the Head of State. It is an antiquated regime and one that seems to dictate unequal treatment. I was not so strong in my conviction until Charles III proved that his desire for self and grandeur outweighs that of the good for the people.
No comments have been added yet.
