Changing World.
I think it is true to say that for many people who contemplate the status of why everything that exists is how it is, may have a popular assumption and that is to think what can be seen is how things have always been.
It can be easy to believe that certain constants in our lives have previously always been, for example trees, grass and people. The next assumption for some, might be to think that it is necessary to find something to explain why things are as they are. Many professional people spend their lives claiming they have the final piece to the puzzle of life and existence. However it is easy to be trapped in a thought process of fitting the pieces in a way that supports an initial assumption. Take the Earth as the centre of creation and a concept that everything has been arranged for mankind's benefit. In an attempt at more fully interpreting any further analysis on this subject, other considerations such as geology, astronomy and biology may well open up a deeper comprehension.
Having an enlightened understanding of people’s ideas and view of the way of things can be extremely useful. There is no doubt that things change over time. However for many people they ask the question: has that change occurred with a goal or is it the result of natural consequences?
Personally I think it is imperative when investigating any particular form of life to gain a wider picture or timeline. Over the course of world history there have been numerous life extinctions. There have been radical changes in the environment that have benefited some forms of life and extinction for others.
The truth of most situations can be discovered but how one achieves a conclusion can be both crucial and influential. There are certain topics that can only be fully comprehended if broadly compared and contrasted with knowledge and facts from previous events. There are highly determining human and natural factors that can alter an outcome and only when this factual reasoning is blended with a wider, historical knowledge perspective, that I think a most reliable theory can be drawn.
It can be easy to believe that certain constants in our lives have previously always been, for example trees, grass and people. The next assumption for some, might be to think that it is necessary to find something to explain why things are as they are. Many professional people spend their lives claiming they have the final piece to the puzzle of life and existence. However it is easy to be trapped in a thought process of fitting the pieces in a way that supports an initial assumption. Take the Earth as the centre of creation and a concept that everything has been arranged for mankind's benefit. In an attempt at more fully interpreting any further analysis on this subject, other considerations such as geology, astronomy and biology may well open up a deeper comprehension.
Having an enlightened understanding of people’s ideas and view of the way of things can be extremely useful. There is no doubt that things change over time. However for many people they ask the question: has that change occurred with a goal or is it the result of natural consequences?
Personally I think it is imperative when investigating any particular form of life to gain a wider picture or timeline. Over the course of world history there have been numerous life extinctions. There have been radical changes in the environment that have benefited some forms of life and extinction for others.
The truth of most situations can be discovered but how one achieves a conclusion can be both crucial and influential. There are certain topics that can only be fully comprehended if broadly compared and contrasted with knowledge and facts from previous events. There are highly determining human and natural factors that can alter an outcome and only when this factual reasoning is blended with a wider, historical knowledge perspective, that I think a most reliable theory can be drawn.
No comments have been added yet.
