date
newest »

message 1:
by
Tawna
(new)
Apr 16, 2012 06:19PM

reply
|
flag

Writing a novel takes time and energy and imagination, and someone writing six lines in three and a half minutes shouldn't be able to take that away from you. If you had beta readers, maybe you can look back at their comments and remind yourself what they liked. You have some 5-star reviews here. So clearly there is a difference of opinion. Some people hate dystopian fiction (unfortunately it's not a favorite of mine so I haven't read your book myself.) Sometimes the reason a book gets slammed is all about the reader, not the writer.
I'd advise a moratorium on reading reviews for a week, while you work on the sequel and remind yourself how much fun it is to just write. If you can't make yourself do that then some kind of moral support (chocolate, booze or a fuzzy cat) but don't let a couple of reviews have that much power if you can help it. Best wishes.



Pride & Prujudice: 2 stars (26390) | 1 star (15269)
Game of Thrones: 2 stars (2856) | 1 star (1500)
Twilight: | 2 stars (95767) | 1 star (108279)
The Hunger Games: | 2 stars (7614) | 1 star (3202)
Harry Potter: | 2 stars (31241) | 1 star (17797)
The Great Gatsby: | 2 stars (68527) | 1 star (30791)
1984: | 2 stars (30242) | 1 star (14482)
Slaughterhouse 5: | 2 stars (22056) | 1 star (15660)
The Cat in the Hat: (yes, DR. SUESS) | 2 stars (4099) | 1 star (1159)
Next time an author sees a negative review, they can reference this and know that they're in good company.
Go look at books you absolute admire and think are the world's best fiction and all your friends love it. Then read some of the one star reviews on it. =) Promise you'll feel better.
Everyone has different taste, different enjoyments, different flavors. Look at the hype around 50 Shades of Grey. It's a best seller and a large number of romance review sites are talking about how awful it is and denigrating. It's all subjective.
