Who Was Responsible for the Nord Stream Attacks, and Will This, In Conjunction with the “Sham” Referendums, Bring Us into World War III?
All we heard for weeks leading up to the referendums in the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson Oblasts was that they would be a “sham” (a new buzzword to be parroted by the corporate media), and even though there is no willingness in the West to consider that the people of eastern Ukraine could actually want to join Russia, we now hear the echoes that Vladimir Putin is ready to use nuclear weapons to defend these regions. Since President Joe Biden has stated that the referendums are a violation of international law and illegitimate, unconditional American support for Volodymyr Zelensky’s government will continue, thus extending the war. Zelensky has now officially sent a formal request for NATO membership, which, if accepted, will mean direct and nuclear war between the United States and Russia. Russia will not back down from protecting its new claimed territories, and the United States and Ukraine will continue fighting to recapture them. Apart from a diplomatic solution, continuing casualties and destruction will be the result, and Zelensky is asking for President Biden to sacrifice Americans on his behalf, while he refuses to negotiate a peace deal (you are either with us or against us, and there is no nuance allowed). Invoking Article 5 of NATO’s charter over Ukraine would not be a matter for joking.
As far as the referendums are concerned, American officials have provided no evidence that they were bogus, and if it knew that Russia would manipulate the results, why would it not share what it knows with the public? Simply suggesting that they had to be fake because that is what Russia does is not a satisfactory argument, especially given the constant lying and manipulation on the part of the United States government. Maybe the Biden administration knew that the will of the people of the four regions of Ukraine was to reunite with Russia, and since it did not like that idea, it planted a marketing campaign to cast doubt on the legitimacy.
Either way, if the will of the people of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson is really to secede and “alter or abolish” the form of governance over them (as is stated in the Declaration of Independence), why should we stop them? We argue that we care about the will of the people, until that concept is inconvenient for our agendas. Remember that according to the modern globalist logic, France invaded Great Britain and desecrated British territorial integrity during the American Revolution (what we would now call a violation of international law), and plus, let us not play the moral high ground here, as the United States government (under presidents from both parties) have committed atrocities overseas and invaded or participated in covert operations in countless countries. The increased tensions between the United States and Russia are a serious threat to all people on the planet, but what happened with the Nord Stream pipelines has the potential to bring us over the threshold.
There has been much speculation as to who is responsible for the three simultaneous explosions in both the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines. Of course, the West blames Russia, and Russia blames the United States and Europe, but the facts of the incident remain unclear.
It is possible that Russia could have sabotaged the pipelines, as it is currently playing hardball with Europe by utilizing its leverage of oil control (part of the reason that the first pipeline had stalled in transporting oil is due to American and European sanctions that prevent the necessary parts from reaching the system), and economic terrorism has been committed by both sides (the European people are the real victims of government and geopolitics). Alternatively, Russian operatives could have used the explosions as a false flag to raise global sentiment against the United States, but in order for this option to be viable, Russia would have to do a better job in its accusations against the Biden administration (so far, Putin has said very little and has not made a huge global deal about it). Plus, the Kremlin, knowing that much of the world already views its country negatively, would likely not take the risk of exposing its ill deeds and creating even more hatred towards the motherland.
Why would Russia destroy its own infrastructure that it spent massive amounts of money building and relied on for oil revenue, just to make a point that would not end up being all that beneficial (the West is not going to stop sending arms to Ukraine, so it is not convincing to suggest that this was Russia’s motivation)? If it wanted to freeze the German people and bring Berlin and Washington to the negotiating table, why would it not just turn off the pipeline from within Russia, without causing the need for expensive repairs? It does not really make sense for Russia to have sabotaged its own pipeline. Plus, since the pipeline leaks were in the Baltic Sea and completely within NATO territory, if Russian agents were able to avoid detection by one of the most powerful intelligence and military alliances in history, perhaps the organization is not such a formidable force after all.
If Russia did not cause the pipelines to explode, who did? Well, we can be pretty sure that it was not Germany or the Czech Republic, as both countries have been experiencing massive protests over surging prices and the potential shortage of oil, and an incident like this would certainly make the energy crisis worse (and, of course, The New York Times has to try to equate these protesters with far-right extremists and Putin sympathizers, because anyone who opposes a friendly regime or Biden’s interests is a fascist, conspiracy theorist, and domestic terrorist). It also appears likely that Germany had no idea that the attack would occur, being that the CIA had to alert Berlin to potential terrorist attacks (suggesting that the agency was more knowledgeable of what was happening than the German government).
What about Ukraine? Could Zelensky, desperate for more weapons and equipment, have sabotaged the pipelines to gain more support (for a war effort that he is apparently winning by a huge margin, if you ask the corporate media)? It may seem unlikely that Ukraine would have the technological capability to pull off something like this, but the British government did recently supply Kiev with six autonomous lightweight underwater drones, so is it possible that the country schemed to create a false flag that could be used to bring the United States and NATO closer to a combat role on the battlefield? Still, Ukraine is too occupied with fighting off Russian forces to tie up its resources, so unless Zelensky was so committed to pressuring the West to provide more assistance that he would sacrifice his own readiness capability, it was probably not Ukraine.
Who would have the motive to commit such a heinous act? Could it have been Norway, Denmark, Sweden, or Poland? On the day after the explosions, the Baltic Pipe pipeline, which is an oil highway from Norway to Poland (through Denmark), opened for business. Poland may have been seeking revenge after Russia terminated its oil supply for refusing to purchase in rubles, and now an alternative pipeline exists that can starve Russian oil revenue and allow Poland to lead the way in coercing Europe to diminish its reliance on its enemy. If this was done as a plot to make Norway, Denmark, and Poland the top dogs in oil redistribution in Europe, this could mean a rift in the European Union, being that other countries, and particularly Germany (and its people), will suffer this winter because of Poland’s economic ploy. It is a bit suspicious that Swedish and Danish officials are preventing anyone from investigating the pipelines, and is it possible that a cover up and clearing of evidence are being conducted so that the world cannot know the truth about what transpired?
If Poland was responsible for the attacks, it would not be the first time that it obstructed progress on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, as an incident of Naval interference occurred in 2021 while construction was still underway. However, even if Poland did it, the United States government would have known that it was going to happen, or perhaps the Biden administration orchestrated the whole maneuver.
A member of the European Parliament for Poland, Radoslaw Sikorski, took to social media to show a picture of the leaking pipelines and thank the United States for its involvement. Despite the words being black and white and open on the internet (“thank you, USA”), the post was classified as “Russian disinformation” by Polish officials (a common theme by governments that do not want their dirty deeds exposed). As mentioned previously, the CIA warned Germany that an attack might occur, and it is possible that this was a measure taken in order to make itself look like it tried to stop the attack, but if one of the most sophisticated intelligence agencies in the world really wanted to stop the explosions, it would have done so. Maybe the CIA knew that the attack would occur because it was involved. We do have a whole laundry list of covert operations conducted by the agency to push political agendas in other countries, so it would not be unprecedented that the United States would conduct such an operation, as Sikorski suggested.
Practice runs of unmanned underwater vehicles (think of the UK-provided drones) were being conducted by the United States Navy near Bornholm, Denmark, which is very close to where the explosions occurred; and a MH-60S helicopter (which has the ability to detect submarines, mines, and underwater pipelines) was flying along the route of the pipeline at the time of the explosions. Was the Navy (and perhaps the Sixth Fleet that was in the Baltic Sea at the time) conducting more than just routine operations? It remains unclear, but if there is motive, we can make a pretty good assumption here.
Would the Biden administration intentionally conduct such an act of terrorism? Do not forget that back around February when the president predicted Putin’s invasion, he and Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland (yes, this is the same woman who was involved in the American-backed coup in 2014 against the democratically-elected government under Viktor Yanukovych) confidently declared that “one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” To be clear, these statements do not prove that the United States was responsible for the attacks, but given the history of our government’s involvement in global events, in conjunction with the motivation to pressure Germany into abandoning the second pipeline project, it would seem the most likely scenario. Those right-wing extremists in Germany were not happy about the upcoming winter gas shortages, so the German government may have felt as if it needed to renegotiate talks with Russia to ramp up oil deliveries, but now, this will likely not be an option.
The Biden administration got its way on the Nord Stream pipelines, and now it can continue on its quest to sink the Kremlin and break Russia into smaller republics or force a change in leadership. I have been writing about American aggression towards Russia for years, but the president’s eagerness to force Americans to accept being killed in World War III is disturbing (even if the pipeline was not America’s doing, the president has been doing everything to bring us closer to direct war with Russia, regardless of what he claims). In addition, climate change agendas may be a factor for why the United States government would want to sabotage the pipelines, as this would mean less oil in circulation, and if awareness is raised on how bad the leaks are for the environment, there may be more of a push towards cleaner sources of energy, even if such changes are not economically feasible at this time.
It is difficult to know who was responsible for the Nord Stream explosions, but currently, I am leaning towards an American-Polish collaboration. The final verdict is still out there somewhere, and it is unlikely that the truth will ever be fully known. I am sure that our corporate media and fact checkers will not consider this a coincidence (like they do with the over 100 food processing plants that have mysteriously caught fire over the last few months), since blaming Russia is something that can be accomplished with the sabotage argument. Either way, the implications of this incident will be great, and history will remember what happened, regardless of who is telling the story.
Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.
As far as the referendums are concerned, American officials have provided no evidence that they were bogus, and if it knew that Russia would manipulate the results, why would it not share what it knows with the public? Simply suggesting that they had to be fake because that is what Russia does is not a satisfactory argument, especially given the constant lying and manipulation on the part of the United States government. Maybe the Biden administration knew that the will of the people of the four regions of Ukraine was to reunite with Russia, and since it did not like that idea, it planted a marketing campaign to cast doubt on the legitimacy.
Either way, if the will of the people of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson is really to secede and “alter or abolish” the form of governance over them (as is stated in the Declaration of Independence), why should we stop them? We argue that we care about the will of the people, until that concept is inconvenient for our agendas. Remember that according to the modern globalist logic, France invaded Great Britain and desecrated British territorial integrity during the American Revolution (what we would now call a violation of international law), and plus, let us not play the moral high ground here, as the United States government (under presidents from both parties) have committed atrocities overseas and invaded or participated in covert operations in countless countries. The increased tensions between the United States and Russia are a serious threat to all people on the planet, but what happened with the Nord Stream pipelines has the potential to bring us over the threshold.
There has been much speculation as to who is responsible for the three simultaneous explosions in both the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines. Of course, the West blames Russia, and Russia blames the United States and Europe, but the facts of the incident remain unclear.
It is possible that Russia could have sabotaged the pipelines, as it is currently playing hardball with Europe by utilizing its leverage of oil control (part of the reason that the first pipeline had stalled in transporting oil is due to American and European sanctions that prevent the necessary parts from reaching the system), and economic terrorism has been committed by both sides (the European people are the real victims of government and geopolitics). Alternatively, Russian operatives could have used the explosions as a false flag to raise global sentiment against the United States, but in order for this option to be viable, Russia would have to do a better job in its accusations against the Biden administration (so far, Putin has said very little and has not made a huge global deal about it). Plus, the Kremlin, knowing that much of the world already views its country negatively, would likely not take the risk of exposing its ill deeds and creating even more hatred towards the motherland.
Why would Russia destroy its own infrastructure that it spent massive amounts of money building and relied on for oil revenue, just to make a point that would not end up being all that beneficial (the West is not going to stop sending arms to Ukraine, so it is not convincing to suggest that this was Russia’s motivation)? If it wanted to freeze the German people and bring Berlin and Washington to the negotiating table, why would it not just turn off the pipeline from within Russia, without causing the need for expensive repairs? It does not really make sense for Russia to have sabotaged its own pipeline. Plus, since the pipeline leaks were in the Baltic Sea and completely within NATO territory, if Russian agents were able to avoid detection by one of the most powerful intelligence and military alliances in history, perhaps the organization is not such a formidable force after all.
If Russia did not cause the pipelines to explode, who did? Well, we can be pretty sure that it was not Germany or the Czech Republic, as both countries have been experiencing massive protests over surging prices and the potential shortage of oil, and an incident like this would certainly make the energy crisis worse (and, of course, The New York Times has to try to equate these protesters with far-right extremists and Putin sympathizers, because anyone who opposes a friendly regime or Biden’s interests is a fascist, conspiracy theorist, and domestic terrorist). It also appears likely that Germany had no idea that the attack would occur, being that the CIA had to alert Berlin to potential terrorist attacks (suggesting that the agency was more knowledgeable of what was happening than the German government).
What about Ukraine? Could Zelensky, desperate for more weapons and equipment, have sabotaged the pipelines to gain more support (for a war effort that he is apparently winning by a huge margin, if you ask the corporate media)? It may seem unlikely that Ukraine would have the technological capability to pull off something like this, but the British government did recently supply Kiev with six autonomous lightweight underwater drones, so is it possible that the country schemed to create a false flag that could be used to bring the United States and NATO closer to a combat role on the battlefield? Still, Ukraine is too occupied with fighting off Russian forces to tie up its resources, so unless Zelensky was so committed to pressuring the West to provide more assistance that he would sacrifice his own readiness capability, it was probably not Ukraine.
Who would have the motive to commit such a heinous act? Could it have been Norway, Denmark, Sweden, or Poland? On the day after the explosions, the Baltic Pipe pipeline, which is an oil highway from Norway to Poland (through Denmark), opened for business. Poland may have been seeking revenge after Russia terminated its oil supply for refusing to purchase in rubles, and now an alternative pipeline exists that can starve Russian oil revenue and allow Poland to lead the way in coercing Europe to diminish its reliance on its enemy. If this was done as a plot to make Norway, Denmark, and Poland the top dogs in oil redistribution in Europe, this could mean a rift in the European Union, being that other countries, and particularly Germany (and its people), will suffer this winter because of Poland’s economic ploy. It is a bit suspicious that Swedish and Danish officials are preventing anyone from investigating the pipelines, and is it possible that a cover up and clearing of evidence are being conducted so that the world cannot know the truth about what transpired?
If Poland was responsible for the attacks, it would not be the first time that it obstructed progress on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, as an incident of Naval interference occurred in 2021 while construction was still underway. However, even if Poland did it, the United States government would have known that it was going to happen, or perhaps the Biden administration orchestrated the whole maneuver.
A member of the European Parliament for Poland, Radoslaw Sikorski, took to social media to show a picture of the leaking pipelines and thank the United States for its involvement. Despite the words being black and white and open on the internet (“thank you, USA”), the post was classified as “Russian disinformation” by Polish officials (a common theme by governments that do not want their dirty deeds exposed). As mentioned previously, the CIA warned Germany that an attack might occur, and it is possible that this was a measure taken in order to make itself look like it tried to stop the attack, but if one of the most sophisticated intelligence agencies in the world really wanted to stop the explosions, it would have done so. Maybe the CIA knew that the attack would occur because it was involved. We do have a whole laundry list of covert operations conducted by the agency to push political agendas in other countries, so it would not be unprecedented that the United States would conduct such an operation, as Sikorski suggested.
Practice runs of unmanned underwater vehicles (think of the UK-provided drones) were being conducted by the United States Navy near Bornholm, Denmark, which is very close to where the explosions occurred; and a MH-60S helicopter (which has the ability to detect submarines, mines, and underwater pipelines) was flying along the route of the pipeline at the time of the explosions. Was the Navy (and perhaps the Sixth Fleet that was in the Baltic Sea at the time) conducting more than just routine operations? It remains unclear, but if there is motive, we can make a pretty good assumption here.
Would the Biden administration intentionally conduct such an act of terrorism? Do not forget that back around February when the president predicted Putin’s invasion, he and Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland (yes, this is the same woman who was involved in the American-backed coup in 2014 against the democratically-elected government under Viktor Yanukovych) confidently declared that “one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” To be clear, these statements do not prove that the United States was responsible for the attacks, but given the history of our government’s involvement in global events, in conjunction with the motivation to pressure Germany into abandoning the second pipeline project, it would seem the most likely scenario. Those right-wing extremists in Germany were not happy about the upcoming winter gas shortages, so the German government may have felt as if it needed to renegotiate talks with Russia to ramp up oil deliveries, but now, this will likely not be an option.
The Biden administration got its way on the Nord Stream pipelines, and now it can continue on its quest to sink the Kremlin and break Russia into smaller republics or force a change in leadership. I have been writing about American aggression towards Russia for years, but the president’s eagerness to force Americans to accept being killed in World War III is disturbing (even if the pipeline was not America’s doing, the president has been doing everything to bring us closer to direct war with Russia, regardless of what he claims). In addition, climate change agendas may be a factor for why the United States government would want to sabotage the pipelines, as this would mean less oil in circulation, and if awareness is raised on how bad the leaks are for the environment, there may be more of a push towards cleaner sources of energy, even if such changes are not economically feasible at this time.
It is difficult to know who was responsible for the Nord Stream explosions, but currently, I am leaning towards an American-Polish collaboration. The final verdict is still out there somewhere, and it is unlikely that the truth will ever be fully known. I am sure that our corporate media and fact checkers will not consider this a coincidence (like they do with the over 100 food processing plants that have mysteriously caught fire over the last few months), since blaming Russia is something that can be accomplished with the sabotage argument. Either way, the implications of this incident will be great, and history will remember what happened, regardless of who is telling the story.
Thank you for reading, and please check out my book, The Global Bully, and website.
No comments have been added yet.
