date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Apr 04, 2012 04:45PM
WOW. Just wow.....
reply
|
flag

I was taught to make up my own mind about stuff.
once I've read it (in this case), I can always say: hey, this is not for me.
but until then I would only be basing my opinion on somebody elses, and second hand opinions are just not good enough for me.
I read for two reasons only: for pleasure and information. I don't care what genre a book is being filed under by somebody else, for me it's like wine (or anything else for that matter), there are only two flavours: like and don't like.
other than that: a book is a book is a book.
and if he wants to read worthy adult literature exclusively, just for the sake of it, then he's welcome to it.
my reading time is too precious for me to waste on that kind of thing, I'll keep reading what I enjoy, be it austen, bronte or dickens or even the hunger games, twilight or harry potter.






Not to mention those of us who are parents want to know of good books to recommend to our kids.

I honestly cannot picture anyone giving a blue lagoon what Mr. Stein reads. If he thinks keeping to the adult section of the bookstore makes him more sophisticated than the rest of us, then may he enjoy his bitter grapes in self-satisfied silence.
Personally, I find his article too rife with unfounded assumptions about the purpose of literature, the educational/cultural importance of movies and games, the content of YA books, and the content of adult fiction to have any worthwhile arguments about it.
Stop raining on our parades, Mr Stein! I have a new Emelan novel to anticipate.

Maturity isn't about putting away everything that society deems immature, it's about embracing all life has to offer regardless of age. So in my book, this guy is the immature little boy who thinks playing with toy cars is for babies.
But~ I'd like to believe that his article was just to stir the pot and this is not how he truly feels. If that's the case: well played, sir.


On the other hand, nicely written Alyssa Rosenberg! Now time to go to bed and snuggle into bed and enjoy a few chapters in a *gasp* YA Tamora Pierce novel... :)


Yes, there is a lot of YA out there that isn't particularly complex or mature or even very well-written, but that's no reason to disparage the entire genre. Besides, I've read plenty of so-called adult novels that were poorly-written, badly plotted, and populated by insipid characters; none of them were nearly as complex or engaging as some of the YA I've read. So judge me all you want, Mr. Stein, I'm going to continue reading the works of Scott Westerfeld and Suzanne Collins, Tamora Pierce and J.K. Rowling and Markus Zusak, because I enjoy them. I also enjoy Twain and Whitman, Dickens and Hugo, Verne and Orwell and Bradbury, Vonnegut and Wilde. It's the content of a book that attracts my interest, not the strategy used to market it.


To me, there is no such thing as good genres or bad genres. There are genres I personally like less.
And then there is good or bad literature. Both types always crossing the boundries people set up.
The little prince, for instance, being written for children, is a classic on the same level as any written for adults - and is by the way mainly read by them... And some of the most exellent writing I have read was categorized as young adult fantasy.

Me, too, but I'm biased!

::blush::
And most of us do recommend to unsure parents that they read first before they hand a book to their kids. Nothing explains a book like reading it yourself.

With the exception of some video game-based fan fic, I read everything that my 15 year old does. Sometimes he recommends books to me because he wants to talk to me about them (my intro to Tamora Pierce came about this way). Other times I tell him I need to read it first because I expect some questionable content (Like some George RR Martin works). That doesn’t mean I won't let him read it, but I like to give him a head's up and prepare myself for conversations that the content might bring up. Because I've always done this, he trusts me when I recommend a book aimed at a more adult audience to him (1984, Life of Pi, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, etc).

I was taught to make up my own mind about stuff.
once I've read it (in this case..."
I agree that everyone should form their own opinions on a book after reading it. I read the Twilight series because a friend of mine loved them, but I hated them. I still needed to read it on my own though so I could truly form my own opinion on them.
Wow, there are some really well written comments here. This discussion is thoughtful and meaningful. I'm glad there are so many readers open to the wider fields of literary experience, and I am especially happy to hear intelligent parenting input. I teach. I think I'll have to bookmark this discussion to use in a lesson somewhere.

I say he has picked his own form of punishment for his closed-mindedness.

But "it's embarrassing"?! Really? Let's all be conformist little box-people to avoid embarrassing ourselves. No! Let's instead stand with our dreams and ideals-- if I believe in love and magic, and choose to express that romanticism by getting engaged at Cinderella's castle, that's a declaration of who I am. If the world thinks less of me for that, too bad. Or if I decide to keep reading fairy tales, dancing to the radio, or dreaming about being an actress, that's me. I LIKE reading "young adult" and even children's fiction. In middle school, I could read at a 12th-grade level. You know what I was reading at the time? Nancy Drew. How's that Mr. Stein!?! It didn't mean I was less intelligent. I would even say it has, in the long term, challenged me. My love for Nancy Drew was one of the things that influenced me to major in forensic science. Recently I've been tracking down old editions of Nancy Drew books, ones that were re-written and cleaned up as our culture changed; they're a window into the reality of our past, in ways that are sometimes amusing and sometimes appalling.
And you know what, I'm not embarrassed anymore about what I read. Instead, I read what I want, and love myself for who I am.

I want to believe you're right. But I really didn't catch the sarcasm in his writing.


Me either. However, I just can't believe anyone could write that article, proof read it, and still decide they agreed with it enough to post it. Apparently I live in a happy little bubble.


Well said! If that's what being an "adult" means, then I want none of it!



I say Mr. Stein, you are welcome to your opinion but I will continue to read young adult fiction and adult fiction alike because I prefer to be well rounded. He's living proof of Plato's Allegory of the cave, those who chose to live in ignorance do and are therefore happy because they don't know any better. I chose to stop looking at shadows, maybe someday he can do the same.



Maybe he should have looked into a boarding school. Maybe then he would not have grown up into such an "a__hole".

For example:
"The only thing more embarrassing than catching a guy on the plane looking at pornography on his computer is seeing a guy on the plane reading “The Hunger Games.” Or a Twilight book. Or Harry Potter. The only time I’m O.K. with an adult holding a children’s book is if he’s moving his mouth as he reads."
And:
"You can’t take an adult seriously when he’s debating you over why Twilight vampires are O.K. with sunlight."
This seems more like a jibe at male masculinity than it does at the adult population -- particularly women -- enjoying books such as Hunger Games, Twilight, Harry Potter, etc.
Erin wrote: "Call me Peter Pan, but if growing up means that I can't have my YA fiction without being looked at funny, then I'll happily say I'm 21 for the rest of my life!
Maturity isn't about putting away ev..."
Great reply, Erin. I would an adult read "The Hunger Games" or "Harry Potter" than to never read at all.
Maturity isn't about putting away ev..."
Great reply, Erin. I would an adult read "The Hunger Games" or "Harry Potter" than to never read at all.

Well, not all adult fiction has that, either. I am going to point you at Jasper Fforde now. :)
But in a way, I do agree. I HAVE been trying to read more "adult" books, so I've been keeping the YA to audiobooks and for a while I was reading the Honor Harrington series (nobody can argue THAT is YA!).
I'm taking a break from it for the moment because sometimes scifi is overwhelming. YA doesn't tend to fill my brain with tech talk and war strategies.
Also, aside from generally enjoying YA lit, I also like seeing how life's lessons might be taught in new ways with new books (this is why I hated Twilight so much, no good lessons to learn there). I've been really into fairy-tale retellings lately.
Plus, if I want to have a kid, shouldn't I know what they might be reading? Is this guy really going to just let his kid read whatever and take no interest? This is the same kind of guy that just buys his kid whatever video games and then gripes later about how violent it is when it was his fault for not looking into it in the first place.

Yeah--I'm sure Limbaugh is all satire too--yes, he can be that oblivious.

Secondly, I hope Stein doesn't have children. How sad for them that their father will never read a book with them and explore the themes, characters, and pure loveliness of the writing, thus edifying their desire to read. How sad that he will miss the rich communication and bonding that takes place at such times. How sad that he is so quick to judge others, to place his opinion of YA in print for all to see, and that if his own child seeks to please him they will never, ever be caught dead clutching a work of YA in their hands. Shame on Stein, and shame on those who condemn the genre. Set aside the fact that much of YA today deals with adult content (as our children do each time they leave the house) but shame on those who condemn the desire to embrace the whimsical, the imaginary, and the “childish” in others.
Go find something significant and esteemed to write about, Stein. Otherwise, the New York Times may not allow you to keep writing for their prestigious publication!


I love all your books and I have only been reading them in my 30s. Of all the books I've read in the past 6 years (I'm 36), probably 90% of them have been YA. Mostly because I have a young adult for a daughter and I read books she brings home, but some I read because *I* discovered them or another adult friend turned me on to them, such as with the Hunger Games.
My daughter who is 18 loves books with female heroines which is why we picked the first Alanna book out about 5 years ago and its why we read The Dark Hills Divide by Patrick Carman, along with Graceling and Fire by Kristen Cashore.
My daughter and I sometimes quote your books to each other for no reason at all. I'll sometimes text her with a line and she'll text me back the rest (such as the prophecy from the Trickster's books.)
Something sparked with one of the comments above: young people at the age to be reading YA lit are quite sensitive about being considered "childish." Adults condemning other adults for reading YA are taking "cool points" from those books, and it is hard enough to get kids to read and keep reading. The fact that these books are enjoyable and valuable isn't enough in many young adult eyes. They need what they are doing (hopefully reading) to create interest and admiration from role models and peers around them. This columnist isn't just showing his own insecurities about reading, he's spreading them in a way that might infect more impressionable minds.